“Because the earth needs a good lawyer.”
4 live lawsuits, 204 comments to the agencies, 81 cents of every dollar to the work.
The origin
Earthjustice is the largest nonprofit environmental law organization in the country, and it represents other groups in federal court for free. It works as the law firm for the environment, with more than 200 attorneys litigating public lands, clean air, and wildlife cases on behalf of clients who could never afford the fight. Its tagline says it plainly: “Because the earth needs a good lawyer.” If a conservation case is in front of a federal judge, Earthjustice lawyers are frequently the ones arguing it.
Every year they sign one sentence and file it with the federal government: “We use the power of the law to protect health, preserve ecosystems, and combat climate change.” as filed.
Where the money went, FY2025
Working through the courts on behalf of citizen groups, scientists, environmental and other organizations to ensure that government agencies and private interests follow the law.
Including $2,109,242 granted onward.
PROVIDE FREE LEGAL REPRESENTATION, WORKING THROUGH THE COURTS ON BEHALF OF CITIZEN GROUPS, SCIENTISTS, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS TO ENSURE THAT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND PRIVATE INTERESTS FOLLOW THE LAW.
IRS Form 990 Part III, fiscal year 2025, signed under penalty of perjury.
Media, and policy maker awareness of environmental issues and the role of law in solving them.
Including $4,073,536 granted onward, most of it ($3,900,000) to Earthjustice Action.
PROVIDE INCREASED PUBLIC, MEDIA, AND POLICY MAKER AWARENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND THE ROLE OF LAW IN SOLVING THEM.
IRS Form 990 Part III, fiscal year 2025, signed under penalty of perjury.
Follow the dollar
A good sign, not a scorecard: what matters is the extremes, and this is nowhere near one.
$136,206,276 programs, $16,612,297 management, $14,729,427 fundraising. Form 990, FY2025.
The backers
Backed on the record by David and Lucile Packard Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Resources Legacy Fund and 7 others, latest filing FY24.
The people
Honesty note: leadership comes from each year’s federal filing, so it can run a year behind. If it’s out of date, tell us. Work at Earthjustice? Claim this page.
Those 33 volunteers are people who decided this ground was theirs to defend. If Earthjustice is fighting for your place too, the matchmaker will find your way in.
Find your way inThe record
And 31 more in our case database: a selection we track, not their full docket.
Fights alongside Center for Biological Diversity (12 shared cases), Natural Resources Defense Council (12 shared cases), Sierra Club (8 shared cases), The Wilderness Society (5 shared cases) and Defenders of Wildlife (4 shared cases) and 31 more. Same case, same side, on the federal docket.
The filings
Total revenue by fiscal year, as filed. Point at or tap the line for any year.
| Year | Revenue |
|---|---|
| 2011 | $34,546,225 |
| 2012 | $38,343,960 |
| 2013 | $37,964,755 |
| 2014 | $46,083,715 |
| 2015 | $48,137,000 |
| 2016 | $51,911,899 |
| 2017 | $93,930,788 |
| 2018 | $79,992,361 |
| 2019 | $102,807,555 |
| 2020 | $146,974,685 |
| 2021 | $114,892,586 |
| 2022 | $135,320,966 |
| 2023 | $125,960,142 |
| 2025 | $170,827,511 |
From $34.5M in 2011 to $170.8M in FY25, across 14 public filings (none on record for 2024).
On the Hill
Earthjustice files its own federal lobbying reports: 26 filings from 2019 to 2025, naming 235 bills. The filings, at the Senate.
Most filed on clean air and water, government issues and the budget.
The record
204 comments on federal decisions since 2023, each filed under the group’s own name on regulations.gov. The latest on decisions we track:
Year by year
2023, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, closed; 2023, Sierra Club v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, closed; 2023, Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land Management, closed; 2023, Colorado Conservation Alliance v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, lost; 2020, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bernhardt, settled; 2020, State of California v. Council on Environmental Quality, closed; 2017, S. Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Burke, closed; 2017, Western Energy Alliance v. Zinke, closed; 2017, League of Conservation Voters v. Trump, closed; 2011, Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of Agriculture, won; 2011, State of Alaska v. United States Department of Agriculture, closed; 2014, In re Big Thorne Project & 2008 Tongass Forest Plan, lost; 2008, Wyoming v. United States Department of Agriculture, closed; 1997, Wilderness Society v. Dombeck, closed; 2009, Wilderness Society v. United States Bureau of Land Management, closed; 2009, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Salazar, closed; 2009, Jayne v. Rey, closed; 2021, Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, closed; 2021, Friends of the Earth v. Haaland, closed; 2021, American Wild Horse Campaign v. Haaland, closed; 2016, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, closed; 2016, Wildearth Guardians v. Jewell, closed; 2013, Solenex LLC v. Bernhardt, closed; 2018, State of California v. Zinke, closed; 2018, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. Stewart, closed; 2019, Montana Environmental Information Center v. Bernhardt, closed.
Rust, a case still in court. Green, a funder’s return. Hollow, a filing. Every row is a record we hold: 36 federal cases with the group on the docket, 204 comments filed under its own name, 10 funders whose returns name it. Nothing here is written from memory.
Their ground
Counsel in the federal litigation over the monument’s boundaries
Who’s defending it In the fight · On this place: 1 case in federal court, filed 2024Tongass National ForestHas litigated the Tongass Roadless Rule fights for two decades
Who’s defending it On the ground · Critical threatCabinet Mountains WildernessCounsel in the long-running litigation against the Rock Creek and Montanore mines proposed beneath the wilderness
Who’s defending it On the ground · Critical threatNPR-A Teshekpuk Lake Special AreaCounsel in back to back federal suits challenging the 2025 approval of ConocoPhillips exploration drilling and the 2026 lease sale that offered nearly all of the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area.
Who’s defending it On the ground · Critical threatPacific Remote Islands Marine NMFiled the May 2025 lawsuit challenging the executive order opening the monument to commercial fishing.
Who’s defending it In the fight · Threat developingGreen Mountain National ForestWrote technical comments opposing the Telephone Gap timber sale and mobilized public opposition alongside Standing Trees
Who’s defending itMost urgent first: open comment windows, then live federal cases, then the threat level. See every threatened place on one map, and who stands for each.
Earthjustice files one related organization on its return: Earthjustice Action (501(c)(4)). A related organization shares people or purpose; it does not share the books.
Ways in
Straight to their own donation page. Your dollar never passes through us.
Give on their site ↗Show upVolunteer with themFind their volunteer door on their own site.
Find it on their site ↗SpeakComment and callOpen comment windows and call scripts for fights like these, ready to send.
Public Lands Action NetworkFollowFollow themBears Ears and Grand Staircase, tracked as they move. Alerts when it matters.
Monument WatchThe mission is theirs. The backing is yours.