Congressional Public Lands Score
The first tool ever built to track how every member of Congress votes on America's national parks, national forests, monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges
Legislation Watch
Bills, resolutions, and executive actions that will shape public lands policy. Scores update when legislation reaches a floor vote. See which specific lands are threatened on our Threatened Public Lands Map.
The first use of the Congressional Review Act to overturn a national monument management plan. Grand Staircase-Escalante spans nearly two million acres of irreplaceable fossil beds, ancient rock art, and desert wilderness in Utah.
- Bill Number
- S.J.Res.30
- Sponsor
- Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)
- Current Status
- Introduced in Senate. Could receive floor vote at any time under CRA fast-track procedures.
- What Happens If It Passes
- The 2024 Grand Staircase-Escalante management plan is permanently nullified. The BLM cannot issue a substantially similar plan without new legislation. Nearly two million acres of fossil beds, ancient rock art sites, and desert wilderness lose their management protections.
- Lands Affected
- Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah (approx. 1.87 million acres)
H.R.471/S.1462 would expand categorical exclusions from 3,000 to 10,000 acres for logging projects on national forests, exempting large-scale timber sales from environmental review under NEPA. Proponents frame it as wildfire prevention. The bill passed the House and advanced through the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee.
- Bill Number
- H.R.471 / S.1462
- Sponsors
- Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) / Sen. John Curtis (R-UT)
- Current Status
- Passed House. Advanced through Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee. Awaiting Senate floor vote.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Logging projects up to 10,000 acres on national forests become categorically excluded from environmental review, meaning no environmental impact statement, no public comment period, and no alternatives analysis.
- Lands Affected
- 193 million acres of national forests and grasslands managed by the U.S. Forest Service
H.R.4776 is the broadest rewrite of the National Environmental Policy Act in a generation. It overhauls every federal environmental review, not just energy projects, and is the signature deregulatory bill of the Trump legislative agenda. Companion Senate legislation is circulating.
- Bill Number
- H.R.4776
- Sponsor
- Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA)
- Current Status
- Passed House. Pending Senate. Companion Senate legislation circulating.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Federal agencies lose the ability to conduct thorough environmental reviews before approving energy, mining, infrastructure, and development projects on public lands. NEPA reviews that currently take years would be truncated or eliminated, removing the primary check on industrial development across federal land.
- Lands Affected
- All federal public lands subject to NEPA review (640+ million acres)
H.R.2709 creates categorical exclusions from NEPA for logging projects in and around giant sequoia groves on national forests. The Forest Service already has existing authority to conduct emergency treatments in sequoia groves. This bill bypasses environmental review, limits judicial challenges, and sets a precedent for exempting commercial logging from public oversight across the National Forest System.
- Bill Number
- H.R.2709 / S.4103
- Sponsor
- Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR)
- Current Status
- Passed House March 16, 2026. Senate companion S.4103 referred to committee.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Logging projects in and around giant sequoia groves proceed without environmental impact statements, public comment periods, or alternatives analysis. The categorical exclusion sets a precedent that can be expanded to other forest types and geographies, further eroding NEPA protections across 193 million acres of national forests.
- Lands Affected
- Giant sequoia groves and surrounding areas in Sequoia National Forest, Sierra National Forest, and other national forests in the southern Sierra Nevada. Precedent affects all 193 million acres of the National Forest System.
State Rankings
Average Senate delegation score by state, ranked best to worst
Methodology
Every score is built from official roll call records. Every link goes to the source.
Scoring Formula
Each scored vote carries equal weight. A member's score equals the percentage of scored votes cast in favor of public lands protection.
Missed votes count against a member's score, but not as severely as voting the wrong way. An anti-lands vote adds 1 to the denominator. A missed vote adds 0.5. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 of 18 scored votes and voted against on 3 scores 83%. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 and missed 3 scores 91%. Voting against public lands is twice as damaging as missing a vote. Only members who voted pro-lands on every scored vote without a single absence earn a perfect 100%.
Grade Scale
- A+ 100%, zero missed votes
- A 90 to 100
- B 80 to 89
- C 70 to 79
- D 60 to 69
- F 0 to 59
What Qualifies as a Public Lands Vote
This scorecard includes three categories of recorded floor votes. (1) Final passage and motion-to-proceed votes on legislation and Congressional Review Act resolutions that directly govern federal public lands, including management plans, leasing, land disposal, monument designations, Endangered Species Act implementation affecting federal land, and Forest Service and BLM timber policy. (2) Senate confirmation votes, including en bloc packages, for senior officials at the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture whose positions oversee federal public-lands agencies. (3) Amendment votes during budget resolution and reconciliation vote-a-ramas where the amendment directly addressed public-lands management, the federal land-management workforce, or the sale or disposal of federal land.
Amendment votes where the public-lands connection is incidental to a broader topic, including general energy tax credit amendments, broader environmental regulatory amendments, and workforce or funding amendments that cover federal employees generally, are excluded. Voice votes, amendments ruled out of order without a motion to waive, withdrawn amendments, and procedural motions that do not produce a record of individual members' positions are also excluded. The scorecard is updated as additional qualifying votes occur during the 119th Congress.
Scored Votes
Correction Policy
Citation
For Press and Organizations
This score is designed to be cited and shared by newsrooms, advocacy organizations, and 501(c)(3) groups.
Press Contact
For press inquiries, data requests, or interview requests, contact [email protected]. We respond within 24 hours.
How to Cite This Score
Key Findings
- 8 Congressional Review Act resolutions targeting public lands protections signed into law in a single session, with a 9th pending
- 11 senators voted against public lands on every single scored vote
- 20 F-rated senators face voters in 2026
- 18 votes scored in the Senate and 17 in the House across CRA resolutions, bills, amendments, and confirmations
- Every score traces to an official roll call record on senate.gov or clerk.house.gov
For Organizations
This score uses nonpartisan methodology. No party is named or blamed. Individual members are graded on their votes. This tool is designed to be linkable by 501(c)(3) organizations and can be referenced in legislative testimony, press releases, and advocacy materials.
This tool is free because accountability should be free
Building and maintaining the Congressional Public Lands Score takes hundreds of hours of research, data verification, and development. We don't run ads. We don't sell data. We fund this work through our Substack community.
If this score helped you understand how your lawmakers vote on the places you love, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support keeps this tool updated, keeps the data free, and funds the next investigation.
