Congressional Public Lands Score by More Than Just Parks

Tim Scott

Republican · U.S. Senate · South Carolina

F
0%
Ranked #54 (tied) of 98 scored

Scored under 60%.

Sen. Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, earns an F on the Congressional Public Lands Score. Of the 19 scored Senate votes, Scott cast 0 for public lands and 18 against, and missed 1. The two closest: Yea on One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R.1), 50 to 50, and Yea on Overturning Boundary Waters Mining Ban (H.J.Res.140), 50 to 49. Scott's seat is not on the 2026 ballot.

Every scored vote: 19 of 19 U.S. Senate votes counted

Roll calls and tallies from senate.gov, read October 26, 2026. Which side counts as pro-lands is the scorecard's call on each vote (methodology). Provision ratings: none of these bills has an approved rating yet, so none is named here.

Call Senator Scott through the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.

Open the full record in the scorecard

Public lands bills Scott sponsors or cosponsors

In the 119th Congress, Scott sponsors 0 and cosponsors 4 public lands bills.

Bills and cosponsors from the congress.gov API, read September 24, 2026. A bill is rated only when a named person approves a rating that quotes its provision; none of these has one yet.

Scott's committees

Committee seats from unitedstates/congress-legislators, read July 3, 2026.

Public lands in South Carolina

59 federal land units lie in or reach into South Carolina. The park with a More Than Just Parks guide: Congaree National Park.

Listed park guides first, then by size; the largest 40 of 59 are named.

Drilling, mining and logging on record in South Carolina: 1,064 timber sales (41,478 acres).

Threatened public lands in South Carolina

Federal land units from PAD-US, matched to the state's districts in the More Than Just Parks record, refreshed October 26, 2026; acres are each unit's full size, and units overlap, so they are not added up. Easements on private land are left out. Fires from NIFC; mining claims, leases and timber sales from BLM and Forest Service records; read October 26, 2026.

Who funds Scott on lands issues

PACs and other committees gave Scott's campaign $225,300 in the 2025-26 cycle. Across the 4 cycles on record, oil, gas, mining and timber PACs gave $138,832, and conservation PACs gave $2,000.

CycleAll PACs and committeesOil and gasMining and coalTimberConservation
2019-20$784,199$1,000none$5,000$2,000
2021-22$3,138,299$78,832none$30,500none
2023-24$630,870$5,000none$5,000none
2025-26$225,300nonenone$13,500none

Itemized contributions from committees to the candidate (FEC H0SC01279, FEC S4SC00240), net of refunds, read October 26, 2026. Industry is the giving PAC's industry in the More Than Just Parks record. A contribution says who gave, not why anyone voted as they did.

How Scott compares

The median senator scores 5%. Scott scores 0% and ranks #54 (tied) of 98.

More from South Carolina

Sen. Darline Graham F · Rep. Nancy Mace F · Rep. Joe Wilson F · Rep. Sheri Biggs F · Rep. William Timmons F · Rep. Ralph Norman F · Rep. James Clyburn A · Rep. Russell Fry F

What to ask Scott

Washington office: 104 Hart Senate Office Building. Phone (202) 224-6121. Write to Scott · Official site

From Scott's own record:

Offices and phones from the Senate and House member feeds and unitedstates/congress-legislators, checked October 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

How did Tim Scott vote on One Big Beautiful Bill?

Tim Scott voted Yea on One Big Beautiful Bill (H.R.1) on July 1, 2025. The Senate vote was 50 to 50, and the scorecard counts Nay as the vote for public lands.

Is Tim Scott up for election in 2026?

No. Tim Scott's Senate seat from South Carolina is not on the 2026 ballot. Scott's grade on the 19 scored Senate votes so far is an F.

What public lands are in South Carolina?

59 federal land units lie in or reach into South Carolina. The largest are Sumter National Forest (374,485 acres), Francis Marion National Forest (263,909 acres) and Savannah River Site (195,398 acres).