
Open for comment · closes November 9
BOEM revises offshore energy management plan
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management · federal offshore waters
- What
- A revised federal plan could expand or reshape how offshore waters are opened to energy development.
- Where
- federal offshore waters
- How much
- Federal offshore waters managed for public benefit could face increased industrial energy use.
- By when
- Comments to Bureau of Ocean Energy Management by November 9, 2026.Date from regulations.gov ↗, read October 30, 2026.
What to ask forAll 3 points →
BOEM should not finalize any revised plan for federal offshore waters that expands oil and gas leasing without full public transparency about which specific ocean areas are affected.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Regulations.gov comment docket ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- By whenNovember 9, 2026, from regulations.gov, the document’s comment end date ↗. Read October 30, 2026.
- Read from PLAN’s record October 30, 2026.
Two ways to be heard on this, and both count. Comment for the legal record, then call the members who answer to you.
Comment now3 holes in the agency’s own analysis
Make these points, in your own words
- BOEM should not finalize any revised plan for federal offshore waters that expands oil and gas leasing without full public transparency about which specific ocean areas are affected.
- I oppose any regulatory revision under this docket that weakens conservation standards for federal offshore waters in favor of accelerated energy development.
- BOEM must clearly identify whether this revised plan alters existing lease sale schedules or area management boundaries before moving forward.
Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.
Affects public lands
A revised federal plan could expand or reshape how offshore waters are opened to energy development.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
In the agency’s own words
Other
Regulations.gov comment docket ↗Read the docket on regulations.gov ↗
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
This fight isn’t bound to a map place in PLAN’s record yet. The notice names federal offshore waters; none is a unit on the threatened lands map, so there’s no place page to open or watch.
The photograph on this page: Open water on the Outer Continental Shelf off Virginia (BOEM photo). More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Calling your two senators and your representative is the Call door on this page.
Regulations.govWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.