← All actions
Action 1 of 27Comment window 21 days left
PLAN's read: critical threat

Demand the Army Corps stop the first Ambler Road mine

Arctic Mine Development Project, Upper Kobuk River: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers· Subarctic Creek, Shungnak River, Kobuk RiverArmy Corps public notice ↗Our Ambler Road investigation

Army CorpsWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

A river below Brooks Range peaks, Alaska, from the air
A river below Brooks Range peaks, Alaska, from the air · public land, held in trust for you

The groups on this fight

Six groups have a public record on the Ambler Road

Each is a plaintiff or counsel in the suit over the reissued Ambler Road permits, or has published its opposition to the road. Every link goes to the filing or release itself. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.

Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.

The Ambler Road is meant to reach this mining district, and the Arctic mine is the first one to seek a federal permit.

What’s at risk

The mine would permanently fill 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters, hold its tailings behind a dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek, and run about 13 years, with water treatment continuing after it closes. The applicant's parent company prices that treatment at $1,095 million over 100 years. The upper Kobuk supports the largest spawning sheefish population in northwestern Alaska, and between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou.

If this goes through

Scoped to a single pit, the draft EIS, which the company expects in October 2027, can leave out the Bornite deposit, the claims the road opens, who pays for water treatment after closure and the dust along the haul, and the Corps would decide by September 2028 without answering any of them. Scoping is when the Corps sets the issues, alternatives and data gaps the draft has to address, so what's raised by November 2 goes on the list it has to answer.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

By the numbers, from the documents on the record

Wetlands and waters filled for good
120.7 acres
Corps notice, p. 2

“Fill placement would result in permanent impacts to approximately 120.7 acres (48.9 ha) of wetlands and other waters”

Open the document at p. 2 ↗
Total footprint
1,727.2 acres
Corps notice, p. 2

“The Project would have a total disturbance footprint of approximately 1,727.2 acres (699 hectares [ha])”

Open the document at p. 2 ↗
Ore processed a day
11,000 short tons
Corps notice, p. 1

“The Project is designed to process approximately 11,000 short tons per day”

Open the document at p. 1 ↗
Operating life
about 13 years
Corps notice, p. 2

“Construction is expected to require approximately 3 years followed by an anticipated operating life of approximately 13 years.”

Open the document at p. 2 ↗
Water treatment, first 100 years after closure
$1,095 million
Trilogy Metals Form 10-K, fiscal 2025, p. 59

“amounting to $1,095 million over the 100-year closure period”

Open the source ↗
EIS record of decision due
September 15, 2028
Corps notice, p. 6

“USACE plans to issue a Record of Decision concluding the EIS by September 15, 2028”

Open the document at p. 6 ↗

Each figure is checked word for word against the document its label names; open a label to read the sentence it comes from and the document it’s in.

The agency’s case, tested

What the agency argues, and whether its own record backs it

1
Holds up
3
No support given

The Army Corps of Engineers plans to prepare an environmental impact statement before it decides whether to issue a Section 404 permit for Ambler Metals' open-pit Arctic Mine. The fill for the mine and roads would permanently affect about 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters. The Corps says a full review is required because the mine could significantly affect water, fish, wildlife, subsistence and the regional economy.

“USACE has determined that the Project has the potential to result in significant impacts to aquatic resources, water quality, fish and wildlife resources, subsistence uses, and regional socioeconomic conditions.”

Project Background

Each Ask below goes into your letter when you write it with PLAN on this page, matched to what you tell it about how this land reaches you.

  • Purpose and need

    No support given

    The project is needed to bring domestic supplies of critical minerals to market, as well as to maximize value for Ambler Metals.

    The notice gives some support. The project was added to the Federal Permitting Dashboard under Executive Order 14241, Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production. The ore would come from the Arctic Deposit in northwestern Alaska, which is a domestic source, and shipping concentrate to smelters or refineries outside of Alaska doesn't by itself make the supply foreign. Still, the notice never says which of copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver count as critical minerals. It also doesn't say whether the smelters or refineries are in the United States.

    AskIdentify which minerals are critical, where the concentrate would be smelted and refined, and how much would actually supply domestic markets.

    The agency’s words, the record +

    The agency says

    “The primary need for the Project is to bring domestic supplies of critical minerals to market and maximize value to Ambler Metals LLC.”

    Purpose and Need

    Elsewhere in the same document

    “In Fairbanks concentrate would be transferred to rail for transport to Anchorage, where it would be loaded onto marine vessels for shipment to smelters or refineries outside of Alaska.”

    Project Description

  • Authority

    No support given

    The Corps can decide this project through a Section 404 permit because building it requires discharging fill into waters of the United States.

    The Project Description says fill placement would permanently affect about 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters. That's the kind of fill discharge the cited permit covers, and the figures add up: 110.6 acres of wetlands plus 10.1 acres of ponds and streams. The notice doesn't say which permit would cover the treated water piped into Subarctic Creek, but that gap doesn't weaken the fill permit's reach.

    The agency’s words, the record +

    The agency says

    “Ambler Metals LLC submitted a complete application for a Section 404 permit to USACE on May 19, 2026 to authorize discharge of fill material into waters of the United States required to construct the Project.”

    Project Background

    Elsewhere in the same document

    “Fill placement would result in permanent impacts to approximately 120.7 acres (48.9 ha) of wetlands and other waters including approximately 110.6 acres (44.8 ha) of wetlands and 10.1 acres (4.1 ha) in other waters (i.e., ponds and streams).”

    Project Description

  • Alternatives

    No support given

    Reasonable alternatives will be those that are technically, legally and economically feasible and that meet the identified project purpose and need, developed through scoping.

    The notice commits to studying more than the applicant's plan. It lists a no action alternative, alternatives that avoid, minimize and compensate for impacts both inside and outside the project footprint, and alternatives using alternative practices, all to be developed through scoping. The stated need also includes bringing domestic supplies of critical minerals to market, not only maximizing value to Ambler Metals. Still, the applicant's purpose is to extract minerals profitably with proven, economical methods. The notice doesn't explain how much weight that company goal will carry in deciding which alternatives are reasonable.

    AskDefine the purpose and need broadly enough that alternative tailings locations, road routes and mine designs get full analysis rather than being screened out for profitability.

    The agency’s words, the record and the law +

    The agency says

    “Reasonable alternatives that are technically, legally, and economically feasible and also meet the identified Project purpose and need will be developed through the scoping process.”

    Alternatives

    Elsewhere in the same document

    “The applicant’s purpose is to profitably extract commercial quantities of copper, zinc, lead, and other valuable minerals from the Arctic Deposit ore reserves using proven and economical mining and milling methods.”

    Purpose and Need

    The law

    “consistent with the provisions of this chapter, study, develop, and describe technically and economically feasible alternatives;” National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(F) ↗

Where its own record backs the agency

  • ProcessScoping gives Tribes and the public a real opportunity to review the project and shape the issues the review covers.Why it holds +

    The notice gives several ways to take part. There's a 45-day scoping period, planned meetings in Shungnak, Ambler, Kobuk and Fairbanks, a virtual meeting, and comments by the project website, email, mail or in person. It invites the Native Villages and cities of Ambler, Buckland, Deering, Kiana, Kivalina, Kobuk, Kotzebue, Noorvik, Selawik and Shungnak to act as cooperating and participating entities. It also commits to consultation under Executive Order 13175 and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Some gaps remain. No in-person meetings are listed in Kivalina, Kotzebue, Noorvik, Selawik, Buckland, Deering or Kiana, and the meeting details are tentative and could change because of weather.

    The agency says

    “Scoping provides agencies, Tribes, stakeholders, and the public with an opportunity to review the proposed Project, understand the federal decision-making process, and provide input on the environmental issues that should be considered during preparation of the NEPA document.”

    Scoping

    Its own record backs it

    “Given the remote nature of the Project area and the potential for weather-related travel disruptions in rural Alaska, meeting dates, times, locations, and virtual participation details remain subject to change.”

    Scoping

Read from the agency’s own decision document ↗, all 32 pages. Every quote is checked word for word against it, a claim marked contradicted stands on a quote from the same document, and a second reading argued the agency’s side of every verdict before it was published. The verdicts are our reading; the quotes are the agency’s. A court can set aside agency action it finds “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” (5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) ↗), which is why these gaps are worth putting in the record.

What to say

Make these points, in your own words

  • I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
  • The notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told the SEC the design is '1.5 times the probable maximum flood,' a different standard from a 100-year flood, and its technical report lists a dam breach assessment among the studies still to be done. The EIS should state which design flood the dam and spillways are built for and why the notice's wording differs, model a breach and overtopping with flow paths and travel times down the Shungnak River, test the design against permafrost thaw, and compare filtered, dry-stack tailings and other sites.
  • The notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end. The company's own technical report says the plant will run in perpetuity. A different filing, Trilogy's 2025 Form 10-K, prices treatment at $1,095 million undiscounted over a 100-year closure period ($258 million discounted) and says the company's detailed reclamation plan and closure cost estimate are still to be submitted, for State approval as part of the plan of operations. The technical report also says the discharge criteria are 'to be determined at the later stages of permitting and design.' The EIS should price treatment and dam upkeep for as long as they'd actually run, name who holds that obligation if Ambler Metals LLC, a 50/50 joint venture, is dissolved, and disclose what financial assurance the State will require and when it would be in place.
  • The Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit. Its South Route runs to Bornite Camp, Trilogy's annual report says the Bornite Project would use Arctic's infrastructure once Arctic's ore runs out, and BLM's own supplemental EIS calls the connection that supports both mines reasonably foreseeable. Our count of Alaska's state claim records finds 5,122 active mining claims along the Ambler Road corridor, 3,431 of them staked after the state's development authority applied for the road in November 2015. Clean Water Act rules require the Corps to gather information on cumulative impacts to the aquatic ecosystem, so the EIS should analyze the Ambler Access Project, Bornite and the district's other foreseeable mines together with this one, and say what happens to the mine if the road's permit, which is being challenged in court, doesn't stand.
  • The notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Under them, when a project doesn't need to sit in a wetland to work, alternatives that avoid wetlands are presumed to exist unless clearly shown otherwise, and only the least damaging practicable alternative can be permitted. The company's technical report says the tailings site was chosen in 2017 by weighting environmental concerns, permitting, capital costs and operating costs. The EIS should run a full Guidelines alternatives analysis for the tailings facility, the waste rock pile and each road, and publish the 2017 siting workshop and the 2021 tailings alternatives review.
Show every point from the document
  • The company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock. The notice gives 'approximately 375 million short tons (340 million tonnes)' with the noun missing, and the company's report gives the same 340 million tonnes as its waste rock total. The EIS should confirm what that figure counts, publish and interpret the kinetic leach testing the company has run on waste rock, analyze selenium, zinc and arsenic, which BLM's 2020 Final EIS says can leach at neutral pH, and weigh separating acid-generating rock as an alternative.
  • The notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them. BLM's supplemental EIS confirms Dolly Varden spawning in upper Subarctic Creek, where the tailings would go, and the company's report says some fish overwinter there. Downstream, the Kobuk supports what BLM calls the largest population of spawning sheefish in northwestern Alaska, and between 76 and 94 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use sheefish. The EIS should map spawning and overwintering habitat in the footprint, count the stream miles lost, model how seepage capture and dewatering change the groundwater that keeps those reaches open in winter, and model treated discharge down the Shungnak into the Kobuk.
  • The concentrate goes out by truck. The company's technical report plans about 46 containers of concentrate a day, roughly 23 truck trips a day on the Ambler Road, then rail from Fairbanks. At Red Dog, BLM's own supplemental EIS reports concentrate dust up to 2.5 miles from the haul road even with sealed lids, and heavy metal dust that can persist in the soil for many decades. The EIS should model concentrate dust along every stage of the haul, take baseline metals samples in soil, plants and water before any hauling starts, and set the monitoring result that would stop it.
  • The Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category. Between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou. The EIS should analyze delay and deflection of the herd from the mine's concentrate traffic and access roads together with the Ambler Road, at the herd level and at the Kobuk crossings, and report what happens to those households' harvest.
  • The notice's stated need is to bring domestic supplies of critical minerals to market. Its project description moves that concentrate over the project roads, the Ambler Access Project, the public road system, rail and ship. The Corps' own rule says impacts get the same scope as benefits, and BLM's 2024 record of decision says about 26 miles of the road would cross Gates of the Arctic National Preserve. The notice's cooperating list has neither the National Park Service nor BLM. The EIS should use one route-wide scope for benefits and impacts and invite both agencies, which manage that ground, to cooperate.
  • The notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that purpose. Written that way, dry-stack tailings or a different site can be screened out on cost before harm to waters is compared, though the Corps' rules say the District Engineer uses independent judgment to define purpose and need. The concentrate would ship to smelters outside Alaska with no buyer under contract in the company's 2022 technical report, and the Department of War's investment in Trilogy, closed September 11, 2026, carries warrants that can't be exercised until Phase 1 of the Ambler Road is complete, ten ore trucks use it in a ten-day period, or the company changes control. The EIS should define the purpose broadly enough to compare methods, sites and permit denial, and…
  • The notice invites ten villages and the Northwest Arctic Borough to act as cooperating and participating entities, but schedules in-person scoping meetings in only three of them, Shungnak, Ambler and Kobuk, plus Fairbanks and one virtual session. The Corps should hold or fund meetings or phone sessions in the other seven named communities, take testimony in the languages and ways people there use, and extend scoping so their comments can reach the record.
  • Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.

Also on the record, from our reporting

  • AIDEA's own 2017 review of the Red Dog haul road found that the mine's closure plan and closure funding leave out the road and port, and that dismantling them could cost a lot. For the mill and mine site itself, the Alaska Department of Natural Resources required Teck to post a $558 million closure bond. The Arctic mine would ship its concentrate over the Ambler Access Project, a road the same state authority is developing. (AIDEA, DeLong Mountain Transportation System Asset Management Review, December 2017, pp. 11 and 56 ↗)
  • The Department of War's investment in Trilogy Metals closed on September 11, 2026, for about 10 percent of the company. The warrants it received can't be exercised until Phase 1 of the Ambler Access Project is complete, ten ore-concentrate trucks use it in any ten-day period, or the company changes control, so part of the federal government's position in the company is tied to the road this mine would ship on. (Trilogy Metals Form 8-K, September 14, 2026, with the executed warrant (Exhibits 10.1 to 10.5) ↗)
Every point is checked against the agency’s own decision document ↗. 11 findings verified against the text, word for word.

In the agency’s own words

Ambler Metals LLC proposes an open-pit copper, zinc and lead mine at the Arctic Deposit in the Ambler Mining District of northwestern Alaska, processing about 11,000 short tons of ore a day for about 13 years. The project would disturb about 1,727.2 acres, permanently fill about 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters, store tailings behind an engineered dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek, and truck concentrate over the Ambler Access Project to Fairbanks. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, will prepare an EIS before deciding on a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, and is taking scoping com…

Army Corps public notice ↗

On the record for this fight

18 people have filed on this fight through PLAN. The official record is still catching up.

  1. Milton M.39 seals
  2. Al, California36 seals
  3. Katherine S.7 seals
  4. Angeline14 seals
  5. Emily, California32 seals
  6. Daniel T., Arizona14 seals
  7. Karen W.49 seals
  8. and 11 more stewards

Ranked on letters found on the agency’s record, then letters filed. Readers appear as first name and last initial, or as a steward in their state; switch yours off in your record. All boards

Did the agency answer?

11 issues are on this record. The agency has not published its decision document yet, so each one stays pending until the agency answers.

Issues on the record, awaiting the decision

  • PendingThe notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that pu

    The notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that purpose. Written that way, dry-stack tailings or a different site can be screened out on cost before harm to waters is compared, though the Corps' rules say the District Engineer uses independent judgment to define purpose and need. The concentrate would ship to smelters outside Alaska with no buyer under contract in the company's 2022 technical report, and the Department of War's investment in Trilogy, closed September 11, 2026, carries warrants that can't be exercised until Phase 1 of the Ambler Road is complete, ten ore trucks use it in a ten-day period, or the company changes control. The EIS should define the purpose broadly enough to compare methods, sites and permit denial, and disclose where the concentrate would be processed and the federal financial interest in the outcome.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock.

    The company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock. The notice gives 'approximately 375 million short tons (340 million tonnes)' with the noun missing, and the company's report gives the same 340 million tonnes as its waste rock total. The EIS should confirm what that figure counts, publish and interpret the kinetic leach testing the company has run on waste rock, analyze selenium, zinc and arsenic, which BLM's 2020 Final EIS says can leach at neutral pH, and weigh separating acid-generating rock as an alternative.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe concentrate goes out by truck.

    The concentrate goes out by truck. The company's technical report plans about 46 containers of concentrate a day, roughly 23 truck trips a day on the Ambler Road, then rail from Fairbanks. At Red Dog, BLM's own supplemental EIS reports concentrate dust up to 2.5 miles from the haul road even with sealed lids, and heavy metal dust that can persist in the soil for many decades. The EIS should model concentrate dust along every stage of the haul, take baseline metals samples in soil, plants and water before any hauling starts, and set the monitoring result that would stop it.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end.

    The notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end. The company's own technical report says the plant will run in perpetuity. A different filing, Trilogy's 2025 Form 10-K, prices treatment at $1,095 million undiscounted over a 100-year closure period ($258 million discounted) and says the company's detailed reclamation plan and closure cost estimate are still to be submitted, for State approval as part of the plan of operations. The technical report also says the discharge criteria are 'to be determined at the later stages of permitting and design.' The EIS should price treatment and dam upkeep for as long as they'd actually run, name who holds that obligation if Ambler Metals LLC, a 50/50 joint venture, is dissolved, and disclose what financial assurance the State will require and when it would be in place.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told t

    The notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told the SEC the design is '1.5 times the probable maximum flood,' a different standard from a 100-year flood, and its technical report lists a dam breach assessment among the studies still to be done. The EIS should state which design flood the dam and spillways are built for and why the notice's wording differs, model a breach and overtopping with flow paths and travel times down the Shungnak River, test the design against permafrost thaw, and compare filtered, dry-stack tailings and other sites.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.

    The notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Under them, when a project doesn't need to sit in a wetland to work, alternatives that avoid wetlands are presumed to exist unless clearly shown otherwise, and only the least damaging practicable alternative can be permitted. The company's technical report says the tailings site was chosen in 2017 by weighting environmental concerns, permitting, capital costs and operating costs. The EIS should run a full Guidelines alternatives analysis for the tailings facility, the waste rock pile and each road, and publish the 2017 siting workshop and the 2021 tailings alternatives review.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice's stated need is to bring domestic supplies of critical minerals to market.

    The notice's stated need is to bring domestic supplies of critical minerals to market. Its project description moves that concentrate over the project roads, the Ambler Access Project, the public road system, rail and ship. The Corps' own rule says impacts get the same scope as benefits, and BLM's 2024 record of decision says about 26 miles of the road would cross Gates of the Arctic National Preserve. The notice's cooperating list has neither the National Park Service nor BLM. The EIS should use one route-wide scope for benefits and impacts and invite both agencies, which manage that ground, to cooperate.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice invites ten villages and the Northwest Arctic Borough to act as cooperating and participating entities, but schedules in-person scoping meetings in only three of them, Shungnak, Ambler and

    The notice invites ten villages and the Northwest Arctic Borough to act as cooperating and participating entities, but schedules in-person scoping meetings in only three of them, Shungnak, Ambler and Kobuk, plus Fairbanks and one virtual session. The Corps should hold or fund meetings or phone sessions in the other seven named communities, take testimony in the languages and ways people there use, and extend scoping so their comments can reach the record.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them.

    The notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them. BLM's supplemental EIS confirms Dolly Varden spawning in upper Subarctic Creek, where the tailings would go, and the company's report says some fish overwinter there. Downstream, the Kobuk supports what BLM calls the largest population of spawning sheefish in northwestern Alaska, and between 76 and 94 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use sheefish. The EIS should map spawning and overwintering habitat in the footprint, count the stream miles lost, model how seepage capture and dewatering change the groundwater that keeps those reaches open in winter, and model treated discharge down the Shungnak into the Kobuk.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit.

    The Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit. Its South Route runs to Bornite Camp, Trilogy's annual report says the Bornite Project would use Arctic's infrastructure once Arctic's ore runs out, and BLM's own supplemental EIS calls the connection that supports both mines reasonably foreseeable. Our count of Alaska's state claim records finds 5,122 active mining claims along the Ambler Road corridor, 3,431 of them staked after the state's development authority applied for the road in November 2015. Clean Water Act rules require the Corps to gather information on cumulative impacts to the aquatic ecosystem, so the EIS should analyze the Ambler Access Project, Bornite and the district's other foreseeable mines together with this one, and say what happens to the mine if the road's permit, which is being challenged in court, doesn't stand.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category.

    The Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category. Between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou. The EIS should analyze delay and deflection of the herd from the mine's concentrate traffic and access roads together with the Ambler Road, at the herd level and at the Kobuk crossings, and report what happens to those households' harvest.

    From MTJP editorial review

The reporting behind this

From More Than Just Parks

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Now make it count21 days left

Two ways to be heard on this, and both count. Comment for the legal record, then call the members who answer to you.

Comment now