← All actions
Action 2 of 34Comment window 33 days left
Critical threat to public lands

Make the Corps study the whole Ambler mining district

Arctic Mine Development Project, Upper Kobuk River: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers· Subarctic Creek, Shungnak River, Kobuk RiverArmy Corps public notice ↗

Army CorpsWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

A river below Brooks Range peaks, Alaska, from the air
A river below Brooks Range peaks, Alaska, from the air · public land, held in trust for you

The groups on this fight

4 groups work Alaska

By footprint, from the same match the STAND matchmaker runs; none is linked to this decision in our record yet. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.

Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.

The Corps is deciding what its review of the first Ambler mine will study, and comments filed by November 2 can make it take in the whole district, the water treatment that outlasts the mine, and the villages downstream.

What’s at risk

The mine would permanently fill 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters, hold its tailings behind a dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek, and run about 13 years, with water treatment continuing after it closes. The applicant's parent company prices that treatment at $1,095 million over 100 years. The upper Kobuk supports the largest spawning sheefish population in northwestern Alaska, and between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou.

If this goes through

Scoped to a single pit, the draft EIS, which the company expects in October 2027, can leave out the Bornite deposit, the claims the road opens, who pays for water treatment after closure and the dust along the haul, and the Corps would decide by September 2028 without answering any of them. Scoping is when the Corps sets the issues, alternatives and data gaps the draft has to address, so what's raised by November 2 goes on the list it has to answer.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

By the numbers, from the agency’s own document

Wetlands and waters filled for good
120.7 acres
Corps notice, p. 2

“Fill placement would result in permanent impacts to approximately 120.7 acres (48.9 ha) of wetlands and other waters”

Total footprint
1,727.2 acres
Corps notice, p. 2

“The Project would have a total disturbance footprint of approximately 1,727.2 acres (699 hectares [ha])”

Ore processed a day
11,000 short tons
Corps notice, p. 1

“The Project is designed to process approximately 11,000 short tons per day”

Operating life
about 13 years
Corps notice, p. 2

“Construction is expected to require approximately 3 years followed by an anticipated operating life of approximately 13 years.”

Water treatment, first 100 years after closure
$1,095 million
Trilogy Metals Form 10-K, fiscal 2025, p. 59

“amounting to $1,095 million over the 100-year closure period”

Corps decision due
September 15, 2028
Corps notice, p. 6

“USACE plans to issue a Record of Decision concluding the EIS by September 15, 2028”

Each figure is checked word for word against the decision document ↗; open a label to read the sentence it comes from.

The agency’s own analysis

What the notice says, and what it leaves out

5 findings read from the agency’s notice and the record around it, each quoted word for word. Each one is a point a letter can put on the record.

  • the Corps' notice, p. 2

    The agency says

    “flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event”

    The notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told the SEC the design is '1.5 times the probable maximum flood,' a far larger and rarer storm than a 100-year flood, and its technical report lists a dam breach assessment among the studies still to be done.

  • BLM's 2024 Ambler Road Final Supplemental EIS, Vol. 1, p. 3-210

    The record says

    “it is reasonably foreseeable that the existing Bornite-Kobuk road would be connected to Alternative A or B to support the Bornite and Arctic mines”

    The Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit.

  • the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, 40 CFR 230.10(a)(3)

    The record says

    “practicable alternatives that do not involve special aquatic sites are presumed to be available, unless clearly demonstrated otherwise”

    The notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.

  • Trilogy Metals' Form 10-K for fiscal 2025, p. 56

    The record says

    “Most of the waste rock is anticipated to be potentially acid-generating and there will be no separation of waste based on acid generation potential.”

    The company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock.

  • BLM's 2024 Ambler Road Final Supplemental EIS, Vol. 1, p. 3-110

    The record says

    “Dolly Varden spawning has been confirmed in the upper reaches of Subarctic Creek”

    The notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them.

10 things the review has to answer

Make these points, in your own words

  • I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
  • The notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told the SEC the design is '1.5 times the probable maximum flood,' a far larger and rarer storm than a 100-year flood, and its technical report lists a dam breach assessment among the studies still to be done. The EIS should state which design flood the dam and spillways are built for and why the notice's wording differs, model a breach and overtopping with flow paths and travel times down the Shungnak River, test the design against permafrost thaw, and compare filtered, dry-stack tailings and other sites.
  • The notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end. The company's own technical report says the plant will run in perpetuity. A different filing, Trilogy's 2025 Form 10-K, prices treatment at only $1,095 million over a 100-year closure period and says the closure cost estimate is still to come. The technical report also says the discharge criteria are 'to be determined at the later stages of permitting and design.' Alaska law sets financial assurance at the reasonable and probable costs of reclamation. The EIS should price treatment and dam upkeep for as long as they'd actually run, name who holds that obligation if Ambler Metals LLC, a 50/50 joint venture, is dissolved, and say what bond or trust would pay for it, in hand before the Corps decides.
  • The Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit. Its South Route runs to Bornite Camp, Trilogy's annual report says the Bornite Project would use Arctic's infrastructure once Arctic's ore runs out, and BLM's own supplemental EIS calls the connection that supports both mines reasonably foreseeable. Alaska's claim records show 5,122 active state mining claims along the Ambler Road corridor, 3,431 of them staked after the state's development authority applied for the road in November 2015. Clean Water Act rules require the Corps to gather information on cumulative impacts to the aquatic ecosystem, so the EIS should analyze the Ambler Access Project, Bornite and the district's other foreseeable mines together with this one, and say what happens to the mine if the road's permit, which is being challenged in court, doesn't stand.
  • The notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Under them, when a project doesn't need to sit in a wetland to work, alternatives that avoid wetlands are presumed to exist unless clearly shown otherwise, and only the least damaging practicable alternative can be permitted. The company's technical report says the tailings site was chosen in 2017 by weighting environmental concerns, permitting, capital costs and operating costs. The EIS should run a full Guidelines alternatives analysis for the tailings facility, the waste rock pile and each road, and publish the 2017 siting workshop and the 2021 tailings alternatives review.
Show all 12 points from the document
  • The company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock. The notice gives 'approximately 375 million short tons (340 million tonnes)' with the noun missing, and the company's report gives the same 340 million tonnes as its waste rock total. The EIS should confirm what that figure counts, publish and interpret the kinetic leach testing the company has run on waste rock, analyze selenium, zinc and arsenic, which BLM's 2020 Final EIS says can leach at neutral pH, and weigh separating acid-generating rock as an alternative.
  • The notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them. BLM's supplemental EIS confirms Dolly Varden spawning in upper Subarctic Creek, where the tailings would go, and the company's report says some fish overwinter there. Downstream, the Kobuk supports what BLM calls the largest population of spawning sheefish in northwestern Alaska, and between 76 and 94 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use sheefish. The EIS should map spawning and overwintering habitat in the footprint, count the stream miles lost, model how seepage capture and dewatering change the groundwater that keeps those reaches open in winter, and model treated discharge down the Shungnak into the Kobuk.
  • The concentrate goes out by truck. The company's technical report plans about 46 containers of concentrate a day, roughly 23 truck trips a day on the Ambler Road, then rail from Fairbanks. At Red Dog, BLM's own supplemental EIS reports concentrate dust up to 2.5 miles from the haul road even with sealed lids, and heavy metal dust that can persist in the soil for many decades. The EIS should model concentrate dust along every stage of the haul, take baseline metals samples in soil, plants and water before any hauling starts, and set the monitoring result that would stop it.
  • The Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category. Between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou. The EIS should analyze delay and deflection of the herd from the mine's concentrate traffic and access roads together with the Ambler Road, at the herd level and at the Kobuk crossings, and report what happens to those households' harvest.
  • The notice's stated need is to bring critical minerals to market, over the project roads, the Ambler Access Project, the public road system, rail and ship. The Corps' own rule says impacts get the same scope as benefits, and BLM's 2024 record of decision says about 26 miles of the road would cross Gates of the Arctic National Preserve. The notice's cooperating list has neither the National Park Service nor BLM. The EIS should use one route-wide scope for benefits and impacts and invite both agencies, which manage that ground, to cooperate.
  • The notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that purpose. Written that way, dry-stack tailings or a different site can be screened out on cost before harm to waters is compared, though the Corps' rules say the District Engineer uses independent judgment to define purpose and need. The concentrate would ship to smelters outside Alaska with no buyer under contract, and the Department of War's investment in Trilogy, closed September 11, 2026, carries warrants that can't be exercised until the Ambler Road is completed or the company changes control. The EIS should define the purpose broadly enough to compare methods, sites and permit denial, and disclose where the concentrate would be processed and the federal financial interest in the outcome.
  • Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.

Also on the record, from our reporting

Every point is checked against the agency’s own decision document ↗. 11 findings verified against the text, word for word.

In the agency’s own words

Ambler Metals LLC proposes an open-pit copper, zinc and lead mine at the Arctic Deposit in the Ambler Mining District of northwestern Alaska, processing about 11,000 short tons of ore a day for about 13 years. The project would disturb about 1,727.2 acres, permanently fill about 120.7 acres of wetlands and other waters, store tailings behind an engineered dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek, and truck concentrate over the Ambler Access Project to Fairbanks. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, will prepare an EIS before deciding on a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, and is taking scoping com…

Army Corps public notice ↗

Did the agency answer?

11 issues are on this record. The agency has not published its decision document yet, so each one stays pending until the agency answers.

Issues on the record, awaiting the decision

  • PendingThe concentrate goes out by truck.

    The concentrate goes out by truck. The company's technical report plans about 46 containers of concentrate a day, roughly 23 truck trips a day on the Ambler Road, then rail from Fairbanks. At Red Dog, BLM's own supplemental EIS reports concentrate dust up to 2.5 miles from the haul road even with sealed lids, and heavy metal dust that can persist in the soil for many decades. The EIS should model concentrate dust along every stage of the haul, take baseline metals samples in soil, plants and water before any hauling starts, and set the monitoring result that would stop it.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category.

    The Western Arctic Caribou Herd counted 490,000 in 2003 and 121,000 in the 2025 photocensus, and its working group calls Critical, Declining the right management category. Between 88 and 95 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use caribou. The EIS should analyze delay and deflection of the herd from the mine's concentrate traffic and access roads together with the Ambler Road, at the herd level and at the Kobuk crossings, and report what happens to those households' harvest.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock.

    The company expects most of its waste rock to be potentially acid generating and plans to collect and treat the seepage rather than separate that rock. The notice gives 'approximately 375 million short tons (340 million tonnes)' with the noun missing, and the company's report gives the same 340 million tonnes as its waste rock total. The EIS should confirm what that figure counts, publish and interpret the kinetic leach testing the company has run on waste rock, analyze selenium, zinc and arsenic, which BLM's 2020 Final EIS says can leach at neutral pH, and weigh separating acid-generating rock as an alternative.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that pu

    The notice writes the purpose as extracting ore 'using proven and economical mining and milling methods' and the need as maximizing value to Ambler Metals LLC, then says alternatives must meet that purpose. Written that way, dry-stack tailings or a different site can be screened out on cost before harm to waters is compared, though the Corps' rules say the District Engineer uses independent judgment to define purpose and need. The concentrate would ship to smelters outside Alaska with no buyer under contract, and the Department of War's investment in Trilogy, closed September 11, 2026, carries warrants that can't be exercised until the Ambler Road is completed or the company changes control. The EIS should define the purpose broadly enough to compare methods, sites and permit denial, and disclose where the concentrate would be processed and the federal financial interest in the outcome.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them.

    The notice counts 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill without saying what lives in them. BLM's supplemental EIS confirms Dolly Varden spawning in upper Subarctic Creek, where the tailings would go, and the company's report says some fish overwinter there. Downstream, the Kobuk supports what BLM calls the largest population of spawning sheefish in northwestern Alaska, and between 76 and 94 percent of households in the Kobuk River communities use sheefish. The EIS should map spawning and overwintering habitat in the footprint, count the stream miles lost, model how seepage capture and dewatering change the groundwater that keeps those reaches open in winter, and model treated discharge down the Shungnak into the Kobuk.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice names ten villages and the Northwest Arctic Borough as cooperating and participating entities, but schedules in-person scoping meetings in only three of them, Shungnak, Ambler and Kobuk, pl

    The notice names ten villages and the Northwest Arctic Borough as cooperating and participating entities, but schedules in-person scoping meetings in only three of them, Shungnak, Ambler and Kobuk, plus Fairbanks and one virtual session. The Corps should hold or fund meetings or phone sessions in the other seven named communities, take testimony in the languages and ways people there use, and extend scoping so their comments can reach the record.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe notice's stated need is to bring critical minerals to market, over the project roads, the Ambler Access Project, the public road system, rail and ship.

    The notice's stated need is to bring critical minerals to market, over the project roads, the Ambler Access Project, the public road system, rail and ship. The Corps' own rule says impacts get the same scope as benefits, and BLM's 2024 record of decision says about 26 miles of the road would cross Gates of the Arctic National Preserve. The notice's cooperating list has neither the National Park Service nor BLM. The EIS should use one route-wide scope for benefits and impacts and invite both agencies, which manage that ground, to cooperate.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.

    The notice counts 110.6 acres of wetlands and 10.1 acres of ponds and streams as permanent fill but never mentions the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Under them, when a project doesn't need to sit in a wetland to work, alternatives that avoid wetlands are presumed to exist unless clearly shown otherwise, and only the least damaging practicable alternative can be permitted. The company's technical report says the tailings site was chosen in 2017 by weighting environmental concerns, permitting, capital costs and operating costs. The EIS should run a full Guidelines alternatives analysis for the tailings facility, the waste rock pile and each road, and publish the 2017 siting workshop and the 2021 tailings alternatives review.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end.

    The notice says water treatment would continue after mining and reclamation end. The company's own technical report says the plant will run in perpetuity. A different filing, Trilogy's 2025 Form 10-K, prices treatment at only $1,095 million over a 100-year closure period and says the closure cost estimate is still to come. The technical report also says the discharge criteria are 'to be determined at the later stages of permitting and design.' Alaska law sets financial assurance at the reasonable and probable costs of reclamation. The EIS should price treatment and dam upkeep for as long as they'd actually run, name who holds that obligation if Ambler Metals LLC, a 50/50 joint venture, is dissolved, and say what bond or trust would pay for it, in hand before the Corps decides.

    From MTJP editorial review

  • PendingThe notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told t

    The notice says the tailings dam at the headwaters of Subarctic Creek would hold 'flood volume 1.5 times the probable 100-year maximum flood event.' Trilogy Metals, half owner of the applicant, told the SEC the design is '1.5 times the probable maximum flood,' a far larger and rarer storm than a 100-year flood, and its technical report lists a dam breach assessment among the studies still to be done. The EIS should state which design flood the dam and spillways are built for and why the notice's wording differs, model a breach and overtopping with flow paths and travel times down the Shungnak River, test the design against permafrost thaw, and compare filtered, dry-stack tailings and other sites.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text

  • PendingThe Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit.

    The Arctic mine is the first of a district, and the notice describes one pit. Its South Route runs to Bornite Camp, Trilogy's annual report says the Bornite Project would use Arctic's infrastructure once Arctic's ore runs out, and BLM's own supplemental EIS calls the connection that supports both mines reasonably foreseeable. Alaska's claim records show 5,122 active state mining claims along the Ambler Road corridor, 3,431 of them staked after the state's development authority applied for the road in November 2015. Clean Water Act rules require the Corps to gather information on cumulative impacts to the aquatic ecosystem, so the EIS should analyze the Ambler Access Project, Bornite and the district's other foreseeable mines together with this one, and say what happens to the mine if the road's permit, which is being challenged in court, doesn't stand.

    From MTJP editorial review

The reporting behind this

From More Than Just Parks

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Now make it count33 days left

Two ways to be heard on this, and both count. Comment for the legal record, then call the members who answer to you.

Comment now