← All actions
Action 16 of 32Comment window 7 days left
Protective action worth supporting

Reestablish the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Advisory Committee

Reestablishment of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR· Prince William SoundFederal Register 2026-19933 ↗

This committee keeps public voices in decisions about Prince William Sound's ongoing spill recovery.

What’s at risk

Without this committee, communities affected by the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill lose their formal channel to advise the federal government on fishing, wildlife, recreation, and Native land concerns. The spill's long-term ecological and economic consequences in Prince William Sound still require active public oversight.

If we stay silent

The committee is renewed for two years, preserving structured public input on commercial fishing, tourism, hunting, outdoor recreation, wildlife conservation, and Native land issues in the region.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

The agency’s case, tested

What the agency argues, and whether its own record backs it

1
Holds up
5
No support given yet

The Department of the Interior is renewing the charter of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee for 2 years. It says the committee keeps a broad range of public viewpoints available to the Trustee Council that manages the spill settlement funds, as the settlement agreement calls for.

“In order to ensure that a broad range of public viewpoints continues to be available to the Trustee Council, and in keeping with the settlement agreement, the continuation of the Committee is recommended.”

Supplementary Information

Each Ask below goes into your letter when you write it with PLAN on this page, matched to what you tell it about how this land reaches you.

  • Purpose and need

    No support given yet

    No other advisory body or federal source can give the Trustee Council the advice this committee gives.

    The Supplementary Information section says the 1991 Consent Decree that created the Trustee Council also required a public advisory group to advise it. The Public Interest Determination calls this committee the Trustee Council's sole advisory body. Its ten seats cover a specific mix of interests, from commercial fishing to subsistence and native land ownership. The committees in item 4 are listed only as Interior advisory committees. None is described as advising the Trustee Council, which also includes the Department of Agriculture, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and three State of Alaska trustees. The notice doesn't compare those committees to this one directly, but nothing in the text suggests any of them could meet the decree's requirement.

    AskExplain why the Alaska advisory councils listed in item 4 couldn't provide this advice, and show how the committee's work differs from theirs.

    The agency’s words, the record +

    The agency says

    “There is no equivalent body of advisers empaneled to address the specific set of issues the Committee is tasked with, or to assist the Trustee Council with the specific subject matter by providing consensus, group advice.”

    Public Interest Determination

    Elsewhere in the same document

    “The Committee serves the public interest as the sole advisory body to the Trustee Council by providing expertise and professional knowledge essential to the Trustee Council in decisions regarding administration of these funds.”

    Public Interest Determination

  • Purpose and need

    No support given yet

    Over more than 30 years, the committee has successfully advised the Trustee Council on funding, injury assessments, restoration, monitoring and research.

    The October 1992 start date supports the claim of more than 30 years of service. But the notice only names broad topics. It gives no specific recommendation, meeting count, or decision the Trustee Council made because of the committee's advice, so this text doesn't show that the advice succeeded.

    AskName specific committee recommendations from recent years and say how the Trustee Council acted on each one.

    The agency’s words, the record +

    The agency says

    “Specifically, the Committee has successfully advised the Trustee Council in decisions regarding planning, evaluation and allocation of available funds; planning, evaluation and conduct of injury assessments; restoration activities; long term monitoring; and research activities.”

    Public Interest Determination

    Elsewhere in the same document

    “The Committee has provided consistent expertise and consolidated advice to the Trustee Council for over 30 years.”

    Public Interest Determination

  • Purpose and need

    No support given yet

    The Trustee Council's management of the spill funds for resource recovery, research and monitoring greatly benefits the public.

    The notice explains that the Trustee Council manages the civil settlement funds and names its six federal and state members. It gives no figures on how much money remains, what restoration has done, or which injured resources have or haven't recovered. That leaves the claim of tremendous public benefit without data in this text.

    AskReport how much settlement money remains and the recovery status of the injured resources that the committee's advice covers.

    The agency’s words +

    The agency says

    “Trustee Council administration of Exxon Valdez oil spill funds dedicated to the recovery of resources injured by the oil spill, as well as long term research and monitoring, are of tremendous public benefit.”

    Public Interest Determination

  • Show 2 more claims +
    • Authority

      No support given yet

      The 1991 Consent Decree requires this committee, and it obligates Interior to recruit members and run the meetings.

      The Supplementary Information section says the Consent Decree that set up the Trustee Council also required a public advisory group to advise it, and that the committee began in October 1992. The Public Interest Determination says Interior is obligated to solicit members and facilitate meetings. The decree and the charter themselves aren't in this text, but every section describes the requirement the same way.

      The agency’s words, the record +

      The agency says

      “The Committee is a requirement of the Consent Decree, and the Committee Charter identifies the Department of the Interior, Alaska, as the Designated Federal Officer.”

      Public Interest Determination

      Elsewhere in the same document

      “The Department of the Interior is obligated by the Consent Decree to solicit Committee members and facilitate meetings.”

      Public Interest Determination

    • Process

      No support given yet

      The way members are chosen ensures the committee has a balanced range of perspectives and expertise.

      The notice lists ten seats for ten named interests, from commercial fishing to subsistence and native land ownership. It describes a 30-day open call in the Federal Register, requests for names from federal and state agencies, and ads on the Trustee Council website and social media. The detailed balance rules are said to be in the Committee Charter, which isn't in this text.

      The agency’s words, the record +

      The agency says

      “This membership model for the Committee assures a range of perspectives and expertise reflecting the breadth of its responsibilities as identified in the Committee Charter.”

      Public Interest Determination

      Elsewhere in the same document

      “The Committee consists of 10 members representing the following principal interests: aquaculture/mariculture, commercial fishing, commercial tourism, conservation/environmental, native land ownership, recreation, sport hunting/fishing, subsistence, science/technology, and public-at-large.”

      Supplementary Information

      “The call for nominations is also announced on the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council website and the Trustee Council advertises vacancies on social media sites.”

      Public Interest Determination

Where its own record backs the agency

  • EconomicsThe committee will cost up to $25,337 a year, and the Exxon Valdez settlement fund pays all of it.Why it holds +

    The budget lists approximately $5,343 in other federal internal costs and approximately $19,994 in reimbursable costs. Those add up to the stated $25,337. Payments to members are $0, and federal staff time is 0.05 full-time equivalents. The budget line also says all costs are paid by the Exxon Valdez settlement fund. The figures are internally consistent.

    The agency says

    “Any costs incurred by the Department of the Interior for these purposes are paid by Exxon Valdez Oil Spill funds.”

    Public Interest Determination

Read from the agency’s own notice ↗, the notice that opens this window; the full analysis comes later, so what it leaves unsupported is what to ask it to show. Every quote is checked word for word against it, a claim marked contradicted stands on a quote from the same document, and a second reading argued the agency’s side of every verdict before it was published. The verdicts are our reading; the quotes are the agency’s. A court can set aside agency action it finds “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” (5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) ↗), which is why these gaps are worth putting in the record.

What to say

Make these points, in your own words

  • I support this action and urge the agency to advance it.
  • I support reestablishing the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee, which provides a formal public voice on the lasting consequences of the 1989 spill in Prince William Sound.
  • Renew this committee's two-year charter so it can continue advising on wildlife conservation and Native land issues tied to the Exxon Valdez disaster.
  • The committee addresses critical concerns including commercial fishing, tourism, subsistence hunting, and outdoor recreation in Alaska's Prince William Sound region, and its work must continue.
  • Support this reestablishment so that the long-term ecological and economic consequences of the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill remain under active public oversight.
Show all 6 points from the document
  • Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.

In the agency’s own words

The U.S. Department of the Interior is reestablishing the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee (Committee). The Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the General Services Administration, is reestablishing the Committee charter for 2 years. The Committee provides advice related, and not limited to, commercial fishing, tourism, general season and subsistence hunting, outdoor recreation, wildlife conservation, and native land issues.

Federal Register 2026-19933 ↗

The reporting behind this

From More Than Just Parks

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Now make it count7 days left

Two ways to be heard on this, and both count. Comment for the legal record, then call the members who answer to you.

Comment now