← All actions
Action 36 of 39Comment window 18 days left
Affects public lands

Sawtooth Lodge expansion inside the Sawtooth National Recreation Area

Sawtooth Lodge Master Development Plan

U.S. Forest Service· Sawtooth National Recreation Area, Sawtooth National ForestU.S. Forest Service project page ↗

Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

Cutthroat trout, caught and released on a western river
Pictured: Cutthroat trout, caught and released on a western river

The groups on this fight

4 groups work Idaho

By footprint, from the same match the STAND matchmaker runs; none is linked to this decision in our record yet. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.

  • Advocates for the West

    Works Idaho: represented Western Watersheds Project in the Jarbidge grazing litigation, winning 2004 and 2005 NEPA rulings, a 2009 injunction that grazing-as-usual must end, and a 2011 order closing 17 allotments across the 625,000-acre resource area..

  • Center for Biological Diversity

    Works Idaho: plaintiff and co-counsel in the February 2025 lawsuit arguing federal wildlife agencies violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to protect salmon, steelhead, bull trout, and wolverine from the mine..

  • Idaho Conservation League

    Works Idaho: mobilized Idahoans to file Interior Department comments defending Craters of the Moon during the 2017 national monument review, arguing shrinkage would damage the economies of Blaine, Butte, Minidoka, and Power counties..

  • Western Watersheds Project

    Works Idaho: has litigated BLM grazing mismanagement across 1.4 million acres of the Jarbidge and Bruneau river canyonlands since the early 2000s, winning injunctions against permit overruns and Ninth Circuit-affirmed orders requiring allotment assessments and stream protections..

Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.

The Forest Service may authorize new facilities at a private lodge inside a protected recreation area.

What’s at risk

Public land within the Sawtooth National Recreation Area would be used to support expanded private lodge infrastructure. The proposal authorizes new development under a special use permit on federally owned land.

If this goes through

New and expanded lodge facilities would be authorized on public land inside the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, setting a development footprint that shapes the site for years to come.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

3 holes in the agency’s own analysis

Make these points, in your own words

  • I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
  • The Forest Service must rigorously analyze how new facilities proposed in the Sawtooth Lodge Master Development Plan will affect the natural character of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area.
  • The analysis of both new and existing facilities under this special use permit must fully comply with NEPA before any development is approved.
  • Any infrastructure approved under this Master Development Plan must be shown to be compatible with the recreation and conservation purposes of the Sawtooth National Forest.
  • Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.

In the agency’s own words

The Sawtooth National Forest and SNRA propose the analysis of the accepted MDP for the Sawtooth Lodge to include both new and existing facilities.

U.S. Forest Service project page ↗

The reporting behind this

From More Than Just Parks

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Now make it count18 days left

Two ways to be heard on this, and both count. Comment for the legal record, then call the members who answer to you.

Comment now