Comments closed September 14
Stop Abbotts Bridge widening from harming Chattahoochee wetlands
National Park Service · Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, GA
- What
- NPS would allow SR 120 expansion that damages floodplains and wetlands inside Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area.
- Where
- Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, GA
- How much
- Floodplains and wetlands along the Chattahoochee River are at risk from road widening construction within the national recreation area.
- Decided
- Comments closed September 14, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from National Park Service PEPC project page ↗, read August 31, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the NPS Planning (PEPC) project page ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the project page names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedSeptember 14, 2026, from National Park Service PEPC project page, the document’s comment period ↗. Read August 31, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
PLAN's read: high threat
NPS would allow SR 120 expansion that damages floodplains and wetlands inside Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
The agency’s own analysis
What the notice says, and what it leaves out
The window has closed; the record of what was missing stays.
Floodplain and Wetland Statement of Findings for Abbotts Bridge Widening ↗
The agency says
“This document outlines the justification for the project within floodplains and wetlands and the compensatory mitigation actions for the impacts.”
The notice states this is a 'Statement of Findings' prepared to justify work within floodplains and wetlands, but the public notice itself contains no analysis of alternatives to working in the floodplain, as required by Executive Order 11988.
Floodplain and Wetland Statement of Findings for Abbotts Bridge Widening ↗
The agency says
“a Statement of Findings (SOF) has been developed. This document outlines the justification for the project within floodplains and wetlands and the compensatory mitigation actions for the impacts.”
The notice references compliance with both Executive Order 11988 on floodplain management and Executive Order 11990 on wetland protection, but provides no information about the extent, type, or quality of wetlands that will be affected.
The agency says
“Comment period closes Sep 14, 2026 at 11:59 PM Mountain Time”
The comment period runs only 14 days, from August 31 to September 14, 2026, for a 71.5 MB PDF document covering floodplain and wetland impacts in a national recreation area.
Floodplain and Wetland Statement of Findings for Abbotts Bridge Widening ↗
The agency says
“In accordance with National Park Service Procedural Manual #77-2 on Floodplain Management and #77-1 on Wetland Protection, a Statement of Findings (SOF) has been developed.”
The notice identifies compliance with NPS Procedural Manual 77-2 on Floodplain Management and 77-1 on Wetland Protection, but does not state whether a separate NEPA review (Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement) has been completed or is pending for this project.
The agency says
“721000 CHATStatement of Findings 20260831pdf (71.5 MB, PDF file)”
The entire substantive analysis is contained in a single 71.5 MB PDF file, with no summary or excerpts provided in the notice itself.
In the agency’s own words
Floodplain and Wetland Statement of Findings for Abbotts Bridge Widening
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Georgia
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Georgia, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Center for Biological Diversity
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia: Joined the November 2022 environmental lawsuit challenging the Army Corps decisions that cleared the way for the Twin Pines mine beside the refuge.
- National Wildlife Refuge Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia: Sued the Army Corps in November 2022 over the Twin Pines project, helped found the Okefenokee Protection Alliance in 2020, and produced the 2021 documentary Sacred Waters: The Okefenokee in Peril.
- Southern Environmental Law Center
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia: Filed the 2022 lawsuit against the Army Corps over wetlands decisions enabling the Twin Pines mine on behalf of four national groups, and its senior attorney chaired the Okefenokee Protection Alliance executive committee.
- Wild Cumberland
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Cumberland Island National Seashore, Georgia: Opposes all four proposed land exchanges, saying maps, acreage and valuations have never been disclosed and the homesites sit next to Wilderness and Potential Wilderness; held a September 30, 2026 virtual town hall ahead of the October 16 comment deadline.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
In court on this ground
No court case we track is over Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗NPS PEPCWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.