← All fights
Record closed August 17, 2026
Grizzly bear crossing sage flats, Greater Yellowstone

Comments closed August 17

Stop weakening federal protections for grizzly bears

Grizzly bear crossing sage flats, Greater YellowstoneMore Than Just Parks
What
The government is revising rules that determine what actions can harm or kill grizzly bears in the lower 48 states.
Where
lower-48 States
How much
Grizzly bears in the lower 48 states could lose key legal protections if the revised Section 4(d) rule allows more lethal take or fewer restrictions on killing.
Decided
Comments closed August 17, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read October 29, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
  • WhatOur plain-English read of the Federal Register 2026-14450 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
  • WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
  • How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
  • DecidedAugust 17, 2026, from Federal Register, the notice's DATES field (federalregister.gov API) ↗: “Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 pm eastern time on the closing date.”. Read October 29, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
  • Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
Who signed this

Brian R. Nesvik

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A person signed this, not an agency. The window has closed and the signature stands, which is exactly when accountability matters.

What to say

Short is better. You are asking Director Nesvik to answer for a decision their office made.

My name is [your name] and I'm calling from [your city and state]. Brian R. Nesvik, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, signed the decision on Stop weakening federal protections for grizzly bears. I'm asking that office to answer for it publicly. Please record that I called and tell me what the office intends to do.

Official channels only, about this decision. No personal phone numbers, no home addresses, no personal social accounts, and nothing abusive. The point is to make the office answer, and an abusive call is the one thing that lets it off the hook.

What the proposal said, and what the decision did

No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.

No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.