← All actions
Record closed August 17, 2026
High threat to public lands

Stop weakening federal protections for grizzly bears

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Grizzly Bear Listing on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife With a Revised Section 4(d) Rule; Proposed Revision of the Protective Regulations Under Section 4(d)

Fish and Wildlife Service· lower-48 StatesFederal Register 2026-14450 ↗

Grizzly bear crossing sage flats, Greater Yellowstone
Grizzly bear crossing sage flats, Greater Yellowstone · public land, held in trust for you

The government is revising rules that determine what actions can harm or kill grizzly bears in the lower 48 states.

What’s at risk

Grizzly bears in the lower 48 states could lose key legal protections if the revised Section 4(d) rule allows more lethal take or fewer restrictions on killing. The agency is splitting the listing decision from the protective rules, which could leave bears vulnerable during the gap.

If this goes through

Weakened protective regulations could permanently expand circumstances under which grizzly bears can be killed, setting back decades of recovery progress.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

In the agency’s own words

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or FWS), notify the public that we are making changes to our January 15, 2025, proposed rule to revise the protective regulations for the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) in the lower-48 States under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act or ESA). We are reopening the comment period because we are proposing substantive changes to the protective regulations in the January 15, 2025, proposed rule. Comments previously submitted will be considered and do not need to be resubmitted now. However, we invite comments on the new information…

Federal Register 2026-14450 ↗

The reporting behind this

From More Than Just Parks

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Who signed this

Brian R. Nesvik

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

A person signed this, not an agency. The window has closed and the signature stands, which is exactly when accountability matters.

What to say

Short is better. You are asking Director Nesvik to answer for a decision their office made.

My name is [your name] and I'm calling from [your city and state]. Brian R. Nesvik, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, signed the decision on Stop weakening federal protections for grizzly bears. I'm asking that office to answer for it publicly. Please record that I called and tell me what the office intends to do.

Official channels only, about this decision. No personal phone numbers, no home addresses, no personal social accounts, and nothing abusive. The point is to make the office answer, and an abusive call is the one thing that lets it off the hook.