Stop Loon Mountain Resort's permit expansion in White Mountain National Forest
Loon Mountain Resort Expansion
U.S. Forest Service· White Mountain National ForestU.S. Forest Service project page ↗
Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
The groups on this fight
2 groups work Maine
Likely to care, a guess from footprint by the same match the STAND matchmaker runs; none is linked to this decision in our record yet. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Appalachian Mountain Club
Likely to care · a guess, not linked to this decision
Works Maine: has permanently conserved nearly 130,000 acres of the Maine North Woods in the 100-Mile Wilderness south of Katahdin through its Maine Woods Initiative since 2003.
- Friends of Acadia
Likely to care · a guess, not linked to this decision
Works Maine: they work only in Maine.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
The Forest Service may authorize new ski trails, lifts, and facilities on public forest land.
What’s at risk
Public forest land in White Mountain National Forest would be opened to expanded private resort development, including new trails, lifts, and facilities. The proposal would also amend the 2005 Forest Plan, locking in changes to how this land is managed.
If this goes through
Loon Mountain Resort would gain an enlarged special use permit area on federal land, and the Forest Plan amendment could make those development terms harder to reverse.
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
4 holes in the agency’s own analysis
Make these points, in your own words
- I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
- This proposal would expand Loon Mountain Resort's special use permit area inside the White Mountain National Forest, converting more public forest land to private resort use.
- The 2005 Forest Plan should not be amended to accommodate a private resort's commercial expansion without rigorous NEPA review that fully weighs impacts on public lands.
- Adding new trails, lifts, and facilities under this Master Development Plan would permanently alter the character of the White Mountain National Forest for all public users.
- I oppose amending the 2005 Forest Plan to enlarge Loon Mountain Resort's footprint, as public lands in the White Mountain National Forest should be managed for broad public benefit, not private development.
Show every point from the document
- Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.
In the agency’s own words
Implement projects included in Loon Mountain Resort's 2024 Master Development Plan to include new trails, lifts and facilities within and adjacent to its existing special use permit area. The proposal includes an expansion of the permit area and amendment of the 2005 Forest Plan.
The reporting behind this
From More Than Just ParksAfter more than a decade chasing peak color across America, we built the foliage map we always wanted.
More logging. Fewer protections for big trees, roadless country and wildlife. Another sweeping change to America’s public lands is moving fast.
Another foreign mining company wants a piece of America’s public lands. This one comes with millions of gallons of groundwater pumping and radioactive radon.
More actions that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .