Comments closed October 6
Reestablish the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Advisory Committee
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
- What
- This committee keeps public voices in decisions about Prince William Sound's ongoing spill recovery.
- Where
- The notice names no place; see the agency’s own words under Case.
- How much
- Annual committee budget, all sources: Up to $25,337. Number of committee seats: 10 members. Nominations open call period: 30-day open call.
- Decided
- Comments closed October 6, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read October 1, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Federal Register 2026-19933 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- Up to $25,337“Up to $25,337. All costs are paid by the Exxon Valdez settlement fund.” Public Interest Determination Open the document ↗
- 10 members“The Committee consists of 10 members representing the following principal interests” SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Open the document ↗
- 30-day open call“the Department of the Interior announces a 30-day open call for nominations period in the Federal Register” Public Interest Determination Open the document ↗
- DecidedOctober 6, 2026, from Federal Register, the document’s comment close date (federalregister.gov) ↗. Read October 1, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 13, 2026.
Doug Burgum
Secretary of the Interior
A person signed this, not an agency. The window has closed and the signature stands, which is exactly when accountability matters.
Short is better. You are asking Secretary Burgum to answer for a decision their office made.
My name is [your name] and I'm calling from [your city and state]. Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior, signed the decision on Reestablish the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Advisory Committee. I'm asking that office to answer for it publicly. Please record that I called and tell me what the office intends to do.
Official channels only, about this decision. No personal phone numbers, no home addresses, no personal social accounts, and nothing abusive. The point is to make the office answer, and an abusive call is the one thing that lets it off the hook.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Protective action worth supporting
This committee keeps public voices in decisions about Prince William Sound's ongoing spill recovery.
What’s at risk
If we stay silent
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
By the numbers, from the agency’s own document
- Annual committee budget, all sources
Public Interest Determination
Open the document ↗“Up to $25,337. All costs are paid by the Exxon Valdez settlement fund.”
- Number of committee seats
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Open the document ↗“The Committee consists of 10 members representing the following principal interests”
- Nominations open call period
Public Interest Determination
Open the document ↗“the Department of the Interior announces a 30-day open call for nominations period in the Federal Register”
- Federal staff supporting the committee
Public Interest Determination
Open the document ↗“Federal personnel on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis: 0.05 FTEs.”
- Years the committee has operated
Public Interest Determination
Open the document ↗“The Committee has provided consistent expertise and consolidated advice to the Trustee Council for over 30 years.”
Source: the agency’s document ↗
Testing the agency’s case
What the agency argues, and whether its own record backs it
- 1
- Holds up
- 5
- Not backed yet
The Department of the Interior is renewing the charter of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee for 2 years. It says the committee keeps a broad range of public viewpoints available to the Trustee Council that manages the spill settlement funds, as the settlement agreement calls for.
“In order to ensure that a broad range of public viewpoints continues to be available to the Trustee Council, and in keeping with the settlement agreement, the continuation of the Committee is recommended.”
Supplementary Information
Purpose and needNot backed yetNo other advisory body or federal source can give the Trustee Council the advice this committee gives.
The Supplementary Information section says the 1991 Consent Decree that created the Trustee Council also required a public advisory group to advise it. The Public Interest Determination calls this committee the Trustee Council's sole advisory body. Its ten seats cover a specific mix of interests, from commercial fishing to subsistence and native land ownership. The committees in item 4 are listed only as Interior advisory committees. None is described as advising the Trustee Council, which also includes the Department of Agriculture, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and three State of Alaska trustees. The notice doesn't compare those committees to this one directly, but nothing in the text suggests any of them could meet the decree's requirement.
The agency’s words, the record +Hide the words
The agency says
“There is no equivalent body of advisers empaneled to address the specific set of issues the Committee is tasked with, or to assist the Trustee Council with the specific subject matter by providing consensus, group advice.”
Public Interest Determination
Elsewhere in the same document
“The Committee serves the public interest as the sole advisory body to the Trustee Council by providing expertise and professional knowledge essential to the Trustee Council in decisions regarding administration of these funds.”
Public Interest Determination
Purpose and needNot backed yetOver more than 30 years, the committee has successfully advised the Trustee Council on funding, injury assessments, restoration, monitoring and research.
The October 1992 start date supports the claim of more than 30 years of service. But the notice only names broad topics. It gives no specific recommendation, meeting count, or decision the Trustee Council made because of the committee's advice, so this text doesn't show that the advice succeeded.
The agency’s words, the record +Hide the words
The agency says
“Specifically, the Committee has successfully advised the Trustee Council in decisions regarding planning, evaluation and allocation of available funds; planning, evaluation and conduct of injury assessments; restoration activities; long term monitoring; and research activities.”
Public Interest Determination
Elsewhere in the same document
“The Committee has provided consistent expertise and consolidated advice to the Trustee Council for over 30 years.”
Public Interest Determination
Purpose and needNot backed yetThe Trustee Council's management of the spill funds for resource recovery, research and monitoring greatly benefits the public.
The notice explains that the Trustee Council manages the civil settlement funds and names its six federal and state members. It gives no figures on how much money remains, what restoration has done, or which injured resources have or haven't recovered. That leaves the claim of tremendous public benefit without data in this text.
The agency’s words +Hide the words
The agency says
“Trustee Council administration of Exxon Valdez oil spill funds dedicated to the recovery of resources injured by the oil spill, as well as long term research and monitoring, are of tremendous public benefit.”
Public Interest Determination
Show 2 more claims +Show fewer
AuthorityNot backed yetThe 1991 Consent Decree requires this committee, and it obligates Interior to recruit members and run the meetings.
The Supplementary Information section says the Consent Decree that set up the Trustee Council also required a public advisory group to advise it, and that the committee began in October 1992. The Public Interest Determination says Interior is obligated to solicit members and facilitate meetings. The decree and the charter themselves aren't in this text, but every section describes the requirement the same way.
The agency’s words, the record +Hide the words
The agency says
“The Committee is a requirement of the Consent Decree, and the Committee Charter identifies the Department of the Interior, Alaska, as the Designated Federal Officer.”
Public Interest Determination
Elsewhere in the same document
“The Department of the Interior is obligated by the Consent Decree to solicit Committee members and facilitate meetings.”
Public Interest Determination
ProcessNot backed yetThe way members are chosen ensures the committee has a balanced range of perspectives and expertise.
The notice lists ten seats for ten named interests, from commercial fishing to subsistence and native land ownership. It describes a 30-day open call in the Federal Register, requests for names from federal and state agencies, and ads on the Trustee Council website and social media. The detailed balance rules are said to be in the Committee Charter, which isn't in this text.
The agency’s words, the record +Hide the words
The agency says
“This membership model for the Committee assures a range of perspectives and expertise reflecting the breadth of its responsibilities as identified in the Committee Charter.”
Public Interest Determination
Elsewhere in the same document
“The Committee consists of 10 members representing the following principal interests: aquaculture/mariculture, commercial fishing, commercial tourism, conservation/environmental, native land ownership, recreation, sport hunting/fishing, subsistence, science/technology, and public-at-large.”
Supplementary Information
“The call for nominations is also announced on the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council website and the Trustee Council advertises vacancies on social media sites.”
Public Interest Determination
Where its own record backs the agency
EconomicsThe committee will cost up to $25,337 a year, and the Exxon Valdez settlement fund pays all of it.Why it holds +
The budget lists approximately $5,343 in other federal internal costs and approximately $19,994 in reimbursable costs. Those add up to the stated $25,337. Payments to members are $0, and federal staff time is 0.05 full-time equivalents. The budget line also says all costs are paid by the Exxon Valdez settlement fund. The figures are internally consistent.
The agency says
“Any costs incurred by the Department of the Interior for these purposes are paid by Exxon Valdez Oil Spill funds.”
Public Interest Determination
How this was read
Read from the agency’s own notice ↗, the notice that opens this window; the full analysis comes later, so what it leaves unsupported is what to ask it to show. Every quote is checked word for word against it, a claim marked contradicted stands on a quote from the same document, and a second reading argued the agency’s side of every verdict before it was published. The verdicts are our reading; the quotes are the agency’s. A court can set aside agency action it finds “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” (5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) ↗), which is why these gaps are worth putting in the record.
In the agency’s own words
The U.S. Department of the Interior is reestablishing the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee (Committee). The Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the General Services Administration, is reestablishing the Committee charter for 2 years. The Committee provides advice related, and not limited to, commercial fishing, tourism, general season and subsistence hunting, outdoor recreation, wildlife conservation, and native land issues.
Who signs it
Doug Burgum
Secretary of the Interior
Where the notice says so
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗On the record for this fight
1 person told us they filed on this fight through PLAN; we haven’t found that letter on the agency’s record yet.
- Emily, California35 seals
Ranked on letters found on the agency’s record, then letters filed. Readers appear as first name and last initial, or as a steward in their state; switch yours off in your record. All boards
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper for free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.