Comments closed March 10
Oppose Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · South Atlantic, FL
- What
- NMFS has received applications from four state agencies (Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina) for exempted fishing permits that would let them and participating fishermen bypass certain federal rules on recreational red snapper harvest in the South Atlantic. The permits, if issued, would run pilot programs in 2026 to test state-level data collection and management strategies, with results shaping potential follow-on permits in 2027 and 2028. This affects recreational red snapper fishermen and federal fisheries managers across the South Atlantic region.
- Where
- South Atlantic, FL, GA, NC, SC
- How much
- We have no figure for this fight yet; the agency’s own words are under Case.
- Decided
- Comments closed March 10, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read May 6, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur summary of the Federal Register 2026-02927 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchNo verified figure is on the record for this fight.
- DecidedMarch 10, 2026, from Federal Register, the document’s comment close date (federalregister.gov) ↗. Read May 6, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Affects public lands
NMFS has received applications from four state agencies (Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina) for exempted fishing permits that would let them and participating fishermen bypass certain federal rules on recreational red snapper harvest in the South Atlantic. The permits, if issued, would run pilot programs in 2026 to test state-level data collection and management strategies, with results shaping potential follow-on permits in 2027 and 2028. This affects recreational red snapper fishermen and federal fisheries managers across the South Atlantic region.
In the agency’s own words
NMFS announces the receipt of four applications for exempted fishing permits (EFP) from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GADNR), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR), and North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF). If issued by NMFS, each EFP would exempt the applicable state agency and participating fishermen from specific Federal regulations applicable to the recreational harvest of red snapper in the South Atlantic. The applicants each propose to pilot test state data collection and management strategies for the rec…
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Florida and Georgia
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Florida and Georgia, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Everglades Foundation
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Everglades National Park, Florida: The science and restoration muscle behind Everglades protection.
- Friends of the Everglades
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Everglades National Park, Florida: Founded by Marjory Stoneman Douglas to defend the River of Grass.
- Southern Environmental Law Center
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia: Filed the 2022 lawsuit against the Army Corps over wetlands decisions enabling the Twin Pines mine on behalf of four national groups, and its senior attorney chaired the Okefenokee Protection Alliance executive committee.
- Wild Cumberland
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Cumberland Island National Seashore, Georgia: Opposes all four proposed land exchanges, saying maps, acreage and valuations have never been disclosed and the homesites sit next to Wilderness and Potential Wilderness; held a September 30, 2026 virtual town hall ahead of the October 16 comment deadline.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.