How do I submit a public comment on Wapiti Post-Fire Recovery?

The public comment window for this decision closed on August 12, 2026. The record of what was at stake stays on this page.

When is the public comment deadline for Wapiti Post-Fire Recovery?

The comment window closed on August 12, 2026.

Do public comments actually change federal decisions?

Yes, when they are substantive. Agencies are legally required to read and respond to substantive comments before finalizing a rule, and specific personal comments about real places and real uses carry far more weight than identical form letters. Courts have overturned rules when agencies ignored substantive comments.

Stop post-fire logging in Sawtooth National Recreation Area

What the proposal said, and what the decision did

No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.

No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.

PLAN's read: high threat

A language model's read of the agency's notice, not an agency rating and not an editor's finding. It’s read from the official notice ↗, and it isn’t a grade.

The Forest Service wants to log and clear vegetation across the 2024 Wapiti Fire burn area in Sawtooth.

What’s at risk

Burned forest in the Sawtooth National Recreation Area faces timber harvest and fuels removal before natural recovery can occur. Post-fire landscapes often regenerate on their own, and early intervention can remove the snags and downed wood that wildlife and soil depend on.

If this goes through

If approved, the project would authorize commercial timber harvest and hazardous fuels reduction inside the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, removing burned material that would otherwise support post-fire ecological recovery.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

In the agency’s own words

The Sawtooth National Recreation Area is proposing hazardous fuels reduction, timber harvest, and essential road work to support post‑fire recovery in the 2024 Wapiti Fire area, improving safety and restoring forest conditions.

Forest Service project page ↗

The groups on this fight

4 groups predicted likely to care in Idaho

Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Idaho, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.

Advocates for the West
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Stibnite Mine / Boise National Forest, Idaho: Lead counsel for the six-group coalition suing over the Stibnite Gold Project, filing the February 2025 complaint, a May 2026 preliminary injunction motion, and a June 2026 emergency appeal to halt construction.
Center for Biological Diversity
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Stibnite Mine / Boise National Forest, Idaho: Plaintiff and co-counsel in the February 2025 lawsuit arguing federal wildlife agencies violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to protect salmon, steelhead, bull trout, and wolverine from the mine.
Idaho Conservation League
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Craters of the Moon National Monument, Idaho: Mobilized Idahoans to file Interior Department comments defending Craters of the Moon during the 2017 national monument review, arguing shrinkage would damage the economies of Blaine, Butte, Minidoka, and Power counties.
Western Watersheds Project
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Bruneau-Jarbidge Rivers, Idaho: Challenging BLM's grazing management across 1.4 million acres of the Jarbidge and Bruneau river canyonlands, where it won an injunction blocking ranchers from grazing beyond their permit limits.

Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.

Who signs it

The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.

The ground

The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.

The photograph on this page: An unpaved national forest road climbing through autumn aspens. It’s the country this decision sits in, not the site itself. More Than Just Parks.

In court on this ground

No court case we track is over Sawtooth National Recreation Area and Sawtooth National Forest.

Who holds the vote

PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.

See how your members vote ↗

Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

Filed underLogging Wildfire Fuels Management Road Management Vegetation Management Environmental review Post Fire Recovery

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .

Stop post-fire logging in Sawtooth National Recreation Area

What the proposal said, and what the decision did

In the agency’s own words

4 groups predicted likely to care in Idaho

More fights that need you

Go deeper, free

See how your members of Congress vote on public lands

See the places under active threat