Comments closed September 8
Peloncillo Mountains restoration plan nears final approval
U.S. Forest Service · Coronado National Forest, Douglas Ranger District
- What
- The Forest Service is close to approving large-scale vegetation and fire treatments across 85,129 acres in the Peloncillo Mountains.
- Where
- Coronado National Forest, Douglas Ranger District, Peloncillo Mountains, AZ
- How much
- Only people and organizations who submitted written comments during the earlier public participation period are eligible to file an objection.
- Decided
- Comments closed September 8, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Forest Service legal notice in Hidalgo County Herald ↗, read August 15, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Forest Service project page ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the project page names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedSeptember 8, 2026, from Forest Service legal notice in Hidalgo County Herald, published July 24, 2026, plus 45 days under 36 CFR 218.6 ↗. Read August 15, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Affects public lands
The Forest Service is close to approving large-scale vegetation and fire treatments across 85,129 acres in the Peloncillo Mountains.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
The agency’s own analysis
What the notice says, and what it leaves out
The window has closed; the record of what was missing stays.
The agency says
“Estimated exposures are based on a combination of oral, dermal and inhalation exposures resulting from a hypothetical aerial application of herbicide at typical rates.”
The herbicide risk table in Table 6 is based entirely on a 1992 risk assessment calculated for aerial application, yet the document explicitly states no aerial application is proposed.
In the agency’s own words
Ecosystem restoration treatments including prescribed fire, prescribed cutting (hand thinning, mechanical treatment), selective herbicide use, and watershed improvement (erosion control, planting, seeding, reforestation) on approximately 85,129 acres in the Peloncillo Mountains.
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Arizona
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Arizona, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Center for Biological Diversity
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Oak Flat / Chi'chil Bildagoteel, Arizona: Plaintiff in the federal litigation over the Resolution Copper land exchange, now on appeal at the Ninth Circuit.
- Grand Canyon Conservancy
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona: A nonprofit partner of Grand Canyon National Park.
- Grand Canyon Trust
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni National Monument, Arizona: Intervened in federal court to defend the monument designation against the Arizona Legislature's lawsuit.
- Sierra Club
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Sonoran Desert National Monument, Arizona: The Grand Canyon Chapter has been co-plaintiff with Western Watersheds Project in the monument grazing litigation, including the 2021 case that produced the 2024 restricted-grazing plan.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
In court on this ground
No court case we track is over Coronado National Forest.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.