
Comments closed May 26
Oppose Public Meeting and Correction of Public Land
Bureau of Land Management · Public lands under PLO 7668, UT
- What
- Interior proposes extending a withdrawal that kept public lands off-limits to mining claims. The extension would continue protections for lands previously withdrawn under PLO 7668, preventing new mineral location and entry while the Department evaluates long-term management.
- Where
- Public lands under PLO 7668, UT
- How much
- We have no figure for this fight yet; the agency’s own words are under Case.
- Decided
- Comments closed May 26, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read May 9, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur summary of the Federal Register 2026-03540 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchNo verified figure is on the record for this fight.
- DecidedMay 26, 2026, from Federal Register, the document’s comment close date (federalregister.gov) ↗. Read May 9, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
PLAN's read: high threat
Interior proposes extending a withdrawal that kept public lands off-limits to mining claims. The extension would continue protections for lands previously withdrawn under PLO 7668, preventing new mineral location and entry while the Department evaluates long-term management.
In the agency’s own words
The Secretary of the Interior proposes to extend Public Land Order (PLO) No. 7668, that withdrew public lands from location and entry under the United States mining laws, but not leasing under the mineral or geothermal leasing laws, subject to valid existing rights, to protect the ongoing operation, maintenance and possible future replacement of the Diamond Fork Systems of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project for an additional 20-year term. The acreage described in PLO No. 7668 has been corrected to 6,558.96 acres to reflect the official land description and two parcels identified in the PLO have been…
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Utah
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Utah, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Bears Ears National Monument, Utah: The five-Tribe coalition that petitioned for the monument and shared in managing it until the July 2026 proclamation disbanded the Bears Ears Commission.
- Grand Staircase Escalante Partners
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Grand Staircase-Escalante, Utah: The monument’s friends group: Science, stewardship, and the legal fight over its boundaries.
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Green River (Flaming Gorge to Colorado), Utah: Sued BLM in August 2024 to void 51 reaffirmed oil and gas leases in the San Rafael Desert, including one in the heart of the Labyrinth Canyon Wilderness carved by the Green River.
- Utah Diné Bikéyah
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Bears Ears National Monument, Utah: The Native-led nonprofit whose cultural mapping work built the original monument proposal.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
The photograph on this page: Desert bighorn sheep in red-rock canyon country. It’s the country this decision sits in, not the site itself. More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.