More Than Just ParksAmerica's Critical LandsPowered byPublic Lands Intelligence

California · Area of Critical Environmental Concern

Red Hills

BLM found a natural system and a scenic value here, and its plan calls for special management. BLM's records place at least 1 mining claim BLM lists as Filed and 8 rights of way inside the line today, and three grazing allotments cover part of it. It covers 9,920 acres and was designated February 1, 2008, in the Sierra.

Acres9,920
DesignatedFeb 1, 2008Sierra
BLM founda natural system and a scenic valueand found it important
Inside, at least11rights of way and allotments, and 1 claim BLM lists as Filed

The line

Red Hills
Filed, claimant withheld, 1Right of way, 8
Ground: USGS The National Map, topographic tiles. Boundaries: BLM's own, read Oct 20, 2026. 8 marks are where BLM's own maps draw them; 1 claim is placed at the middle of the section its land description names, not at the stakes on the ground. Hover or tap one for its holder. The 3 grazing allotments below aren't marked.

Who holds the claims

At least 1 claim sits inside this line: 0 active and 1 filed and pending, 1 with a claimant BLM withholds under the Privacy Act. BLM lists 1 as Filed.

  • Names withheld by BLM (private individuals)1claim

BLM's mining rules list designated ACECs among the places where mining that disturbs the surface beyond casual use needs a plan of operations BLM approves. Exploration of five acres or less can go ahead on a notice instead.

The rights of way

8 rights of way sit inside the line. BLM files 5 under non-energy facilities and 3 under other energy facilities.

  • SBC2rights of way
  • PACIFIC ULTRAPOWER1right of way
  • A private individual, name withheld by this site1right of way
  • PG&E1right of way
  • DIESTEL FARMS1right of way

Grazing allotments

3 grazing allotments cover part of this line. Their permittees aren't named here yet.

  • Poor Mans Gulch1,199acres
  • Don Pedro East Serpentine909acres
  • Turnback Creek Pasture304acres

The nearest areas

More from BLM's California office

Every area BLM's California office holds

The proposed rule

A proposed rule, RIN 1004-AF53, would change how BLM drafts every land use plan, and how it designates ACECs like Red Hills. The comment window hasn't opened: the proposed rule wasn't in the Federal Register at our last check. The Watch sends one email the day it prints.

The rule's abstract

The purpose of this rulemaking is to establish in regulations an updated process for the approval of the development, revision, amendment, and maintenance of land use plans, as provided for by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, for public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Additionally, this rulemaking will provide clarification of the process the BLM uses for designating Areas of Critical Environmental Concern.Unified Agenda entry for RIN 1004-AF53, Publication ID 2026, reginfo.gov (OMB OIRA), read Oct 18, 2026

Watch the ruleWhere the rule stands