Lifetime Public Lands Score
Every current member's record on federal public lands across their whole time in Congress. One ledger per person, House and Senate, scored on the same rule as the 119th.
Legislation Watch
Bills, resolutions, and executive actions that will shape public lands policy. Scores update when legislation reaches a floor vote. See which specific lands are threatened on our Threatened Public Lands Map.
The House passed H.R.1501 on September 2 by a vote of 218 to 201. The bill writes mining permanently into the FAST-41 fast track and bars the Permitting Council from limiting that treatment to critical minerals projects, so mining and mineral processing projects on BLM or National Forest land can be placed on the FAST-41 track, with binding permitting timetables and a shorter window for court challenges. The vote is scored as House vote 16 below. The Senate referred the bill to its Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on September 14.
- Bill Number
- H.R.1501
- Sponsor
- Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-IN)
- Current Status
- Passed the House 218 to 201 on September 2, 2026, roll call 294. Referred to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on September 14, 2026.
- What Happens If It Becomes Law
- Mining and mineral processing projects on federal land become permanently eligible for FAST-41 coordinated permitting, and the Permitting Council is barred from limiting that eligibility to critical minerals. Hardrock mines on BLM and Forest Service land can claim binding review timetables and a two-year limit on lawsuits regardless of the mineral involved.
- Lands Affected
- All BLM and Forest Service lands open to mineral claims (approximately 350 million acres)
H.R.1897 would overhaul the Endangered Species Act by replacing petition deadlines with a national listing work plan that ranks species and can defer decisions for years, requiring economic analysis in listing, critical habitat and recovery decisions, and narrowing court review. The House adopted the rule for floor consideration 211 to 206 on April 22. House leaders can schedule a floor vote any time the House is in session.
- Bill Number
- H.R.1897
- Sponsor
- Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR)
- Current Status
- Reported by House Natural Resources Committee March 24, 2026. The House adopted the rule for floor consideration 211 to 206 on April 22, 2026, roll call 131. No floor vote has been held.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Listing decisions move onto a work plan that ranks species and can hold lower-priority petitions for years. Economic analysis becomes a required part of listing, critical habitat and recovery decisions. Recovery plans carry deadlines and delisting triggers that can force premature delisting.
- Lands Affected
- All federal public lands with critical habitat designations, plus private lands subject to ESA consultation requirements
H.R.471/S.1462 would expand categorical exclusions from 3,000 to 10,000 acres for fuel-reduction and forest-health logging projects on national forests, letting large treatments skip the environmental impact statement and alternatives analysis NEPA normally requires. Proponents frame it as wildfire prevention. The House passed it 279-141 on January 23, 2025 (scored as House vote 11), and the Senate version was placed on the Senate calendar in October 2025, where it awaits floor time.
- Bill Number
- H.R.471 / S.1462
- Sponsors
- Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) / Sen. John Curtis (R-UT)
- Current Status
- Passed House 279-141 on January 23, 2025. S.1462 reported by the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee and placed on the Senate calendar October 27, 2025. Awaiting Senate floor vote.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Fuel-reduction and forest-health logging projects up to 10,000 acres on national forests proceed under a categorical exclusion, with no environmental impact statement and no alternatives analysis.
- Lands Affected
- 193 million acres of national forests and grasslands managed by the U.S. Forest Service
H.R.4776 is the broadest rewrite of the National Environmental Policy Act in a generation. It narrows and speeds every federal environmental review, not just energy projects, and limits court challenges. It passed the House 221-196 on December 18, 2025 with lead sponsors from both parties and is now before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
- Bill Number
- H.R.4776
- Sponsor
- Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR), with Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) as lead cosponsor
- Current Status
- Passed House 221-196 on December 18, 2025 (scored as House vote 7). Referred to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Federal agencies face hard page and time limits, a narrower scope of review, and new limits on who can sue and when, for energy, mining, infrastructure, and development projects on public lands. NEPA reviews that currently take years would be truncated, weakening the primary check on industrial development across federal land.
- Lands Affected
- All federal public lands subject to NEPA review (640+ million acres)
H.R.2709 declares a seven-year emergency on federal land in and around giant sequoia groves so that thinning, hazard-tree removal, and prescribed burning proceed under emergency NEPA procedures with limited review. The Forest Service already has emergency authority to treat sequoia groves. The bill passed the House by voice vote on March 16, 2026 with cosponsors from both parties, and sets a precedent for declaring statutory emergencies to shortcut review elsewhere in the National Forest System.
- Bill Number
- H.R.2709 / S.4103
- Sponsor
- Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA) / Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA)
- Current Status
- Passed House by voice vote March 16, 2026. Senate companion S.4103 introduced March 16, 2026. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a hearing on both bills September 16, 2026.
- What Happens If It Passes
- Thinning and tree-removal projects in and around giant sequoia groves proceed under emergency procedures without environmental impact statements or alternatives analysis for seven years. The statutory emergency sets a precedent that can be copied for other forest types and geographies, further eroding NEPA protections across 193 million acres of national forests.
- Lands Affected
- Giant sequoia groves and surrounding areas in Sequoia National Forest, Sierra National Forest, and other national forests in the southern Sierra Nevada. Precedent affects all 193 million acres of the National Forest System.
State Rankings
Average Senate delegation score by state, ranked best to worst
Methodology
Every score is built from official roll call records. Every link goes to the source.
Scoring Formula
Each scored vote carries equal weight. A member's score is the share of their scored votes cast for public lands, with a missed vote counted as half a vote against.
Missed votes count against a member's score, but not as severely as voting the wrong way. An anti-lands vote adds 1 to the denominator. A missed vote adds 0.5. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 of 18 scored votes and voted against on 3 scores 83%. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 and missed 3 scores 91%. Voting against public lands is twice as damaging as missing a vote. Only members who voted pro-lands on every scored vote without a single absence earn a perfect 100%. Members who joined Congress mid-session (through special elections or appointments) are only scored on votes that occurred after they were sworn in. Votes that took place before they held office are excluded entirely and do not affect their score.
The same rule covers a member who dies or resigns: only the votes taken while they held the seat count. Their record stays on the page, marked with the month they left, but it is not ranked and does not count toward state averages or the totals at the top of the page. A member who held a seat but cast no scored vote is not graded. A member is ranked once their record holds at least 5 counted votes (for, against or missed). Below that the grade still shows, with the number of votes it rests on, and the member is not ranked. When two members have the same score, the one with more counted votes ranks higher; members equal on both share a rank.
Grade Scale
- A+ 100%, with a pro-lands vote on every scored vote of the Congress: none missed, and in office for all of them
- A 90 to 100 (a member at 100% who held the seat for only part of the Congress gets an A)
- B 80 to 89
- C 70 to 79
- D 60 to 69
- F 0 to 59
- NR not rated: no scored vote cast yet
Scores are rounded to the nearest whole percent (an exact half goes to the even number) and the letter is read from the rounded score.
Public Lands Intelligence, our tool for organizations, uses this formula and this scale. It scores the same 19 Senate and 17 House votes under the same ranking rule, and on October 26, 2026 every member's grade, score and rank there matched this page.
What Qualifies as a Public Lands Vote
This scorecard includes three categories of recorded floor votes. (1) Final passage votes (including a vote to agree to the other chamber's version) and motion-to-proceed votes on legislation and Congressional Review Act resolutions that directly govern federal public lands, including management plans, leasing, land disposal, monument designations, Endangered Species Act implementation affecting federal land, and Forest Service and BLM timber policy. (2) Senate confirmation votes, including en bloc packages, for senior officials at the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture whose positions oversee federal public-lands agencies. (3) Amendment votes during budget resolution and reconciliation vote-a-ramas where the amendment directly addressed public-lands management, the federal land-management workforce, or the sale or disposal of federal land.
Amendment votes where the public-lands connection is incidental to a broader topic, including general energy tax credit amendments, broader environmental regulatory amendments, and workforce or funding amendments that cover federal employees generally, are excluded. Voice votes, amendments ruled out of order without a motion to waive, withdrawn amendments, and procedural motions that do not produce a record of individual members' positions are also excluded. The scorecard is updated as additional qualifying votes occur during the 119th Congress.
Lifetime records
Every current member also carries a career record covering the 94th Congress (January 1975) to today, which reaches back to the first vote of the longest-serving member. The same rule applies to every roll call in that window. A member is scored only on votes taken while they held a seat, which the official roll call roster settles. One vote per bill per chamber counts, the passage vote where one exists, with amendments that decide a distinct public lands question counted on their own. Paired and announced positions from earlier decades are shown but not counted. Confirmation votes count only where the nominee held a documented position on public lands. Member positions come from the Voteview record of every roll call since 1789, cross-checked against senate.gov and clerk.house.gov, with bill titles from congress.gov. A lifetime grade appears from a member's first scored vote and shows the number of votes behind it. Written explanations for votes before 2025 are being added over time.
Scored Votes
Correction Policy
Citation
For Press and Organizations
This score is designed to be cited and shared by newsrooms, advocacy organizations, and 501(c)(3) groups.
Press Contact
For press inquiries, data requests, or interview requests, contact ask@morethanjustparks.com. We aim to respond within 24 hours.
How to Cite This Score
Key Findings
- 9 Congressional Review Act resolutions targeting public lands protections signed into law in a single Congress
- 25 senators voted against public lands on every single scored vote
- 22 F-rated senators hold seats that are on the ballot in 2026
- 19 votes scored in the Senate and 17 in the House across CRA resolutions, bills, amendments, and confirmations
- Every score traces to an official roll call record on senate.gov or clerk.house.gov
Lifetime Records
- Every current member of Congress carries a lifetime public lands record back to January 1975, House and Senate, one ledger per person
For Organizations
This score uses nonpartisan methodology. No party is named or blamed. Individual members are graded on their votes. This tool is designed to be linkable by 501(c)(3) organizations and can be referenced in legislative testimony, press releases, and advocacy materials.
This tool is free because accountability should be free
Building and maintaining the Congressional Public Lands Score takes hundreds of hours of research, data verification, and development. We don't run ads. We don't sell data. We fund this work through our Substack community.
If this score helped you understand how your lawmakers vote on the places you love, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support keeps this tool updated, keeps the data free, and funds the next investigation.
