119th Congress · Updated October 2026

Congressional Public Lands Score

How every member of Congress votes on America's national parks, forests, monuments, wilderness and wildlife refuges.

A More Than Just Parks investigation
F
A
2026 Senate Race
Senate
House
Since 1975

Lifetime Public Lands Score

Every current member's record on federal public lands across their whole time in Congress. One ledger per person, House and Senate, scored on the same rule as the 119th.

Best lifetime records
Worst lifetime records
The long view
Hover a Congress
Biggest movers, 119th Congress against lifetime
One ruleOnly votes that directly decide the protection, management, sale, or extraction on federal public lands and the wildlife on them. Same test for 1975 as for 2026.
Eligible votes onlyA member is scored on roll calls taken while holding a seat, settled by the official roster. Paired and announced votes are shown but not counted.
One vote per billThe passage vote counts once per chamber. An amendment that decides a distinct lands question counts on its own.
Primary sourcesPositions from the Voteview record of every roll call, checked against senate.gov and clerk.house.gov, titles from congress.gov.

Legislation Watch

Bills, resolutions, and executive actions that will shape public lands policy. Scores update when legislation reaches a floor vote. See which specific lands are threatened on our Threatened Public Lands Map.

Imminent
H.R.1501 · Passed the House September 2, Now in the Senate
Protecting Domestic Mining Act

The House passed H.R.1501 on September 2 by a vote of 218 to 201. The bill writes mining permanently into the FAST-41 fast track and bars the Permitting Council from limiting that treatment to critical minerals projects, so mining and mineral processing projects on BLM or National Forest land can be placed on the FAST-41 track, with binding permitting timetables and a shorter window for court challenges. The vote is scored as House vote 16 below. The Senate referred the bill to its Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on September 14.

Bill Number
H.R.1501
Sponsor
Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-IN)
Current Status
Passed the House 218 to 201 on September 2, 2026, roll call 294. Referred to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on September 14, 2026.
What Happens If It Becomes Law
Mining and mineral processing projects on federal land become permanently eligible for FAST-41 coordinated permitting, and the Permitting Council is barred from limiting that eligibility to critical minerals. Hardrock mines on BLM and Forest Service land can claim binding review timetables and a two-year limit on lawsuits regardless of the mineral involved.
Lands Affected
All BLM and Forest Service lands open to mineral claims (approximately 350 million acres)
H.R.1897 · Cleared for House Floor
ESA Amendments Act

H.R.1897 would overhaul the Endangered Species Act by replacing petition deadlines with a national listing work plan that ranks species and can defer decisions for years, requiring economic analysis in listing, critical habitat and recovery decisions, and narrowing court review. The House adopted the rule for floor consideration 211 to 206 on April 22. House leaders can schedule a floor vote any time the House is in session.

Bill Number
H.R.1897
Sponsor
Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR)
Current Status
Reported by House Natural Resources Committee March 24, 2026. The House adopted the rule for floor consideration 211 to 206 on April 22, 2026, roll call 131. No floor vote has been held.
What Happens If It Passes
Listing decisions move onto a work plan that ranks species and can hold lower-priority petitions for years. Economic analysis becomes a required part of listing, critical habitat and recovery decisions. Recovery plans carry deadlines and delisting triggers that can force premature delisting.
Lands Affected
All federal public lands with critical habitat designations, plus private lands subject to ESA consultation requirements
H.R.471 · Passed House, On Senate Calendar
Fix Our Forests Act

H.R.471/S.1462 would expand categorical exclusions from 3,000 to 10,000 acres for fuel-reduction and forest-health logging projects on national forests, letting large treatments skip the environmental impact statement and alternatives analysis NEPA normally requires. Proponents frame it as wildfire prevention. The House passed it 279-141 on January 23, 2025 (scored as House vote 11), and the Senate version was placed on the Senate calendar in October 2025, where it awaits floor time.

Bill Number
H.R.471 / S.1462
Sponsors
Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) / Sen. John Curtis (R-UT)
Current Status
Passed House 279-141 on January 23, 2025. S.1462 reported by the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee and placed on the Senate calendar October 27, 2025. Awaiting Senate floor vote.
What Happens If It Passes
Fuel-reduction and forest-health logging projects up to 10,000 acres on national forests proceed under a categorical exclusion, with no environmental impact statement and no alternatives analysis.
Lands Affected
193 million acres of national forests and grasslands managed by the U.S. Forest Service
H.R.4776 · Passed House, Pending Senate
SPEED Act

H.R.4776 is the broadest rewrite of the National Environmental Policy Act in a generation. It narrows and speeds every federal environmental review, not just energy projects, and limits court challenges. It passed the House 221-196 on December 18, 2025 with lead sponsors from both parties and is now before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Bill Number
H.R.4776
Sponsor
Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR), with Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) as lead cosponsor
Current Status
Passed House 221-196 on December 18, 2025 (scored as House vote 7). Referred to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
What Happens If It Passes
Federal agencies face hard page and time limits, a narrower scope of review, and new limits on who can sue and when, for energy, mining, infrastructure, and development projects on public lands. NEPA reviews that currently take years would be truncated, weakening the primary check on industrial development across federal land.
Lands Affected
All federal public lands subject to NEPA review (640+ million acres)
H.R.2709 · Passed House, Pending Senate
Save Our Sequoias Act

H.R.2709 declares a seven-year emergency on federal land in and around giant sequoia groves so that thinning, hazard-tree removal, and prescribed burning proceed under emergency NEPA procedures with limited review. The Forest Service already has emergency authority to treat sequoia groves. The bill passed the House by voice vote on March 16, 2026 with cosponsors from both parties, and sets a precedent for declaring statutory emergencies to shortcut review elsewhere in the National Forest System.

Bill Number
H.R.2709 / S.4103
Sponsor
Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA) / Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA)
Current Status
Passed House by voice vote March 16, 2026. Senate companion S.4103 introduced March 16, 2026. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a hearing on both bills September 16, 2026.
What Happens If It Passes
Thinning and tree-removal projects in and around giant sequoia groves proceed under emergency procedures without environmental impact statements or alternatives analysis for seven years. The statutory emergency sets a precedent that can be copied for other forest types and geographies, further eroding NEPA protections across 193 million acres of national forests.
Lands Affected
Giant sequoia groves and surrounding areas in Sequoia National Forest, Sierra National Forest, and other national forests in the southern Sierra Nevada. Precedent affects all 193 million acres of the National Forest System.
Signed Into Law
H.R.6380 · Public Law 119-133, Signed October 20, 2026
Chiricahua National Park Act

Chiricahua National Monument in southeastern Arizona is now Chiricahua National Park. The law directs the National Park Service to protect traditional cultural and religious sites in the park and to keep them open to members of Indian tribes for traditional uses.

View the Law
Bill Number
H.R.6380, Public Law 119-133
Sponsor
Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ)
Current Status
Passed the House by voice vote March 16, 2026. Passed the Senate by unanimous consent September 30, 2026. Signed October 20, 2026. Neither chamber held a recorded vote, so the law does not change any member's score.
What the Law Does
Redesignates Chiricahua National Monument as Chiricahua National Park. The National Park Service must protect traditional cultural and religious sites in the park and provide tribal access to them. At a tribe's request the Park Service may close the smallest practicable area for the shortest time needed for traditional ceremonies.
Lands Affected
Chiricahua National Monument, now Chiricahua National Park, Arizona
H.R.7831 · Public Law 119-134, Signed October 20, 2026
License to Drill Act

The law extends through fiscal year 2037 the Bureau of Land Management's authority to charge a fee on every oil and gas drilling permit application and send that money to the BLM Permit Processing Improvement Fund, which pays to approve drilling permits on public lands faster. The authority was set to end after fiscal year 2026.

View the Law
Bill Number
H.R.7831, Public Law 119-134
Sponsor
Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT)
Current Status
Passed the House by voice vote June 2, 2026. Passed the Senate by unanimous consent September 30, 2026. Signed October 20, 2026. Neither chamber held a recorded vote, so the law does not change any member's score.
What the Law Does
Keeps BLM's oil and gas permit processing fee and the Permit Processing Improvement Fund in place through fiscal year 2037, so fee money stays dedicated to clearing drilling permits on public lands for another decade.
Lands Affected
BLM lands and federal mineral estate open to oil and gas leasing
Active Legislative Threats
S.J.Res.109 / H.J.Res.151 · Fast Track Lapsed
Grand Staircase-Escalante CRA

The first attempt to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn a national monument management plan, the 2025 plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante and its 1.87 million acres of fossil beds, ancient rock art, and desert wilderness in Utah. The Senate fast-track window closed June 11, 2026 without a vote, so the resolution now needs 60 votes. On July 13, 2026 the president cut the monument itself to 181,541 acres by proclamation, effective September 11.

Bill Number
S.J.Res.109 / H.J.Res.151
Sponsor
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), with Sen. John Curtis (R-UT) / Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT)
Current Status
Introduced March 4, 2026 and referred to committee in both chambers. The Senate's 60-day fast-track window under the Congressional Review Act lapsed June 11, 2026 without a vote, so passage now requires 60 votes. The July 13, 2026 proclamation shrinking the monument has overtaken the plan fight for most of the acreage.
What Happens If It Passes
The 2025 Grand Staircase-Escalante management plan is nullified and the BLM cannot issue a substantially similar plan without new legislation, stripping the management protections written for 1.87 million acres of fossil beds, ancient rock art sites, and desert wilderness.
Lands Affected
Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah (1.87 million acres under the 2025 plan, cut to 181,541 acres by the July 2026 proclamation)
S.220 · Referred to Committee
Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act

S.220 would strip the president's authority to designate or expand national monuments under the Antiquities Act and give that power to Congress. Presidents of both parties have used the 1906 law to protect places from the Grand Canyon to Bears Ears. Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) carries the House companion, H.R.521.

Bill Number
S.220
Sponsor
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)
Current Status
Referred to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
What Happens If It Passes
The president loses unilateral authority to create national monuments. Future monument designations would require an act of Congress, effectively ending the mechanism that created Grand Staircase-Escalante, Bears Ears, and dozens of other protected areas.
Lands Affected
All current and future national monuments designated under the Antiquities Act (hundreds of millions of acres)
H.R.676 · Referred to Committee
NEPA Exemption for Energy and Mining

H.R.676 would declare that federal oil, gas and coal leases and mining approvals on federal land are not major federal actions under NEPA, exempting them from environmental review entirely and removing the safeguard that requires companies to assess water contamination, habitat destruction, and community impacts before breaking ground.

Bill Number
H.R.676
Sponsor
Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY)
Current Status
Referred to House Natural Resources Committee.
What Happens If It Passes
Oil, gas, coal and hardrock mining approvals on federal land proceed without any NEPA review. Companies no longer need to assess risks to water quality, wildlife habitat, or nearby communities before breaking ground on public land.
Lands Affected
All BLM and Forest Service lands open to mineral leasing or claims (approx. 350 million acres)
H.R.845 · Passed House, Pending Senate
Pet and Livestock Protection Act (Gray Wolf Delisting)

H.R.845 orders the Interior Secretary to reissue the 2020 rule that removed gray wolves in the lower 48 states from the endangered species list, outside the Mexican wolf range, and bars any court review of it. Wolves in the Northern Rockies are already delisted, so the practical effect falls on the Great Lakes, the Pacific Coast states and Colorado. Pending in the Senate as S.1306.

Bill Number
H.R.845 / S.1306
Sponsors
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) / Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)
Current Status
Passed House 211-204 on December 18, 2025. Pending Senate vote. The Senate vote is the remaining hurdle.
What Happens If It Passes
Gray wolves outside the Mexican wolf range lose Endangered Species Act protections by act of Congress, bypassing USFWS science-based review. The court-stripping provision prevents anyone from challenging the delisting in federal court.
Lands Affected
Federal public lands with gray wolf habitat still under federal protection, including national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges in the Great Lakes, the Pacific Coast states, and Colorado
H.R.4090 · Passed House, Pending Senate
Critical Mineral Dominance Act

H.R.4090 writes provisions of Trump Executive Orders 14154 and 14241 into law, directing Interior, in consultation with the Agriculture Department, to fast-track hardrock mining projects on BLM land and 193 million acres of National Forest land and to inventory federal land for mining potential. The House rejected, 209-212, a motion that would have barred expedited treatment for mines owned by companies from China and other adversary nations.

Bill Number
H.R.4090
Sponsor
Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN)
Current Status
Passed House 224-195 on February 4, 2026 (Roll Call 55). Senate Energy and Natural Resources subcommittee hearing held July 15, 2026.
What Happens If It Passes
Hardrock mining is fast-tracked across BLM and National Forest land. Interior must identify priority mines for immediate approval, expand production from mine tailings and coal byproducts, and accelerate geologic mapping to identify new mining targets. A bill sold as breaking China's control of critical minerals does not exclude companies from China or other adversary nations from the fast track.
Lands Affected
All BLM and Forest Service lands open to mineral claims (approximately 350 million acres)
H.R.1366 · Passed House, On Senate Calendar
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act

H.R.1366 codifies a reversal of the Rosemont Copper court decision, allowing mining companies to claim additional mill sites on public land next to their claims for waste rock, tailings and processing without a valid mineral discovery. It opens National Forest and BLM land around every mine to waste disposal by right.

Bill Number
H.R.1366
Sponsor
Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV), with Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) as original cosponsor
Current Status
Passed House 219-198 on December 18, 2025 (scored as House vote 8). Placed on the Senate calendar March 17, 2026.
What Happens If It Passes
Mining companies gain the legal right to use adjacent public lands for waste disposal without demonstrating a valid mineral discovery on those lands. National Forest and BLM land surrounding mining operations becomes available for tailings ponds, waste rock dumps, and processing facilities.
Lands Affected
All BLM and Forest Service lands adjacent to active or proposed mining operations
H.R.281 · Cleared for House Floor
Grizzly Bear State Management Act

H.R.281 directs the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue the 2017 Greater Yellowstone grizzly delisting rule and bars judicial review. USFWS determined in January 2025 that delisting is not warranted, and in July 2026 proposed keeping the bears listed as threatened while handing day-to-day management to the states. This bill overrides the agency's own science.

Bill Number
H.R.281
Sponsor
Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY)
Current Status
Passed House Natural Resources Committee 20-19 on July 15, 2025 on a party-line vote. Placed on the House calendar October 3, 2025. Awaiting House floor vote.
What Happens If It Passes
USFWS must reissue the 2017 delisting rule for Greater Yellowstone grizzlies regardless of the agency's scientific determination that delisting is not warranted. Court-stripping provisions prevent legal challenges. Wyoming, Montana and Idaho could then authorize grizzly hunting seasons in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
Lands Affected
Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, including portions of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, six national forests, and BLM land across Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho
H.R.587 · Referred to Committee
Lesser Prairie-Chicken Delisting

H.R.587 would remove the lesser prairie-chicken from the endangered and threatened species lists by statute and bar USFWS from relisting it. A federal court vacated the 2022 listing in 2025 and USFWS finalized its removal on February 25, 2026, so the bill now works to lock that outcome in against any future finding that the bird needs protection.

Bill Number
H.R.587
Sponsor
Rep. Tracey Mann (R-KS)
Current Status
Referred to House Natural Resources Committee January 21, 2025. No committee action.
What Happens If It Passes
The lesser prairie-chicken is barred from Endangered Species Act protection across its five-state range regardless of population data. Federal lands managed by BLM and the Forest Service in the southern Great Plains permanently lose ESA consultation requirements for the species.
Lands Affected
BLM and Forest Service lands across the southern Great Plains in Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico
H.R.180 · In Committee
Endangered Species Transparency and Reasonableness Act

H.R.180 adds procedural hurdles to USFWS listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act, making it harder and slower to protect species on federal public lands.

Bill Number
H.R.180
Sponsor
Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA)
Current Status
Referred to House Natural Resources Committee. Subcommittee hearing held July 22, 2025.
What Happens If It Passes
New procedural requirements slow USFWS listing decisions, giving industries more time to operate without ESA restrictions. Species facing population collapse may not receive protections before critical thresholds are crossed.
Lands Affected
All federal public lands with species that qualify for ESA listing
Executive and Administrative Actions
Administrative Action · Comment Period Open Comments close October 6
Roadless Rule Rescission

USDA announced its proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule on August 18 and published it in the Federal Register on August 20, along with a draft environmental impact statement. The rescission would open roughly 44.7 million acres of inventoried roadless areas to road construction and industrial logging in every state except Idaho and Colorado, which keep state-specific rules covering the rest of the 58.5-million-acre inventory. The public comment window is open now and closes October 6, after USDA extended it in a notice published September 11.

Mechanism
USDA rulemaking to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule
Current Status
Announced August 18, 2026. Proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement published in the Federal Register August 20, 2026. Public comments close October 6, 2026. USDA extended the window in a Federal Register notice published September 11, 2026.
What Happens If It Proceeds
Roughly 44.7 million acres of national forest roadless areas become eligible for road building, logging, and industrial development. The Tongass alone accounts for 9.3 million roadless acres and stores more carbon than any other national forest, about 44 percent of all the carbon held across the National Forest System.
Lands Affected
Inventoried roadless areas across the National Forest System in every state except Idaho and Colorado
Presidential Proclamations · In Effect Since September 11, 2026
Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante Cut by 90 Percent

On July 13, 2026 the president signed proclamations shrinking Bears Ears National Monument from 1.36 million acres to 121,096 acres and Grand Staircase-Escalante from 1.87 million acres to 181,541 acres, removing nearly three million acres of monument protection. The proclamations also end the co-management agreement with the five tribes of the Bears Ears Commission. Conservation groups went back to federal court in Washington on September 2, 2026. On October 13 Judge Tanya Chutkan reopened the 2017 cases and ordered the government to give 48 hours' notice before any ground-disturbing work.

Mechanism
Presidential proclamations under the Antiquities Act, following the Interior Department review ordered in February 2025
Current Status
Proclamations signed July 13, 2026, effective September 11, 2026. Conservation groups moved on September 2, 2026 to reopen the 2017 cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Tanya Chutkan reopened them and lifted the stays on October 13, ordered the government to give plaintiffs 48 hours' notice before any ground-disturbing activity, and on October 21 accepted supplemental complaints challenging the 2026 proclamations. A joint briefing schedule is due November 16. The central question is whether the Antiquities Act lets a president shrink a monument.
What Happens If It Stands
Nearly three million acres lose monument protection and revert to ordinary BLM and Forest Service management, open to new mining claims, leasing, and development. Litigation could take years, during which extractive activity can proceed.
Lands Affected
Bears Ears (1.36 million acres to 121,096) and Grand Staircase-Escalante (1.87 million acres to 181,541), Utah
Final Rule · CRA Resolution on Senate Calendar
ESA Harm Definition Rescission

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA finalized a rule rescinding the definition of harm under the Endangered Species Act, removing habitat destruction from the conduct the law prohibits. Habitat loss is the leading driver of extinction. A Senate resolution to overturn the rule, S.J.Res.204, was introduced August 3. Senators discharged it from committee by petition on September 15, which lets them force a floor vote.

Mechanism
Joint USFWS and NOAA rulemaking rescinding the regulatory definition of harm under the Endangered Species Act
Current Status
Final rule published July 14, 2026, effective September 14, 2026. S.J.Res.204, a Congressional Review Act resolution to overturn it, was introduced by Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) on August 3, 2026. Senators discharged the Environment and Public Works Committee by petition on September 15, and the resolution sits on the Senate calendar as Calendar No. 618.
What Happens If It Stands
Destroying habitat no longer counts as harming a protected species under the ESA. Logging, mining, and development projects that level occupied habitat proceed without take prohibitions as long as no animal is directly killed.
Lands Affected
Every landscape with ESA-listed species, including critical habitat across federal public lands nationwide
Administrative Action · Staffing Reductions
NPS and U.S. Forest Service Workforce Cuts

Budget proposals and hiring freezes have reduced staffing at the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by thousands of positions, affecting wildfire response, trail maintenance, visitor services, and law enforcement across hundreds of millions of acres of public land.

Mechanism
Budget cuts, hiring freezes, and reduction-in-force actions across the Interior and Agriculture departments
Current Status
Ongoing. Thousands of positions eliminated or frozen. Fire crews entered the 2026 fire season understaffed.
What Happens If It Continues
National parks reduce visitor hours and close facilities. Wildfire response capacity drops during lengthening fire seasons. Trail maintenance backlogs grow. Law enforcement coverage thins across remote public lands.
Lands Affected
All 433 National Park units, 193 million acres of national forests, 245 million acres of BLM land, and 573 national wildlife refuges managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Administrative Action · First Mandated Sale Held
Arctic Refuge Lease Sales

BLM held the first of four lease sales required by the 2025 reconciliation law on June 5, 2026, offering 58 tracts covering 688,829 acres of the Arctic Refuge Coastal Plain, the calving ground of the Porcupine caribou herd. Only two Alaska bidders showed up, taking five tracts covering 72,490 acres for $3.7 million. Three more sales are required by 2032.

Mechanism
BLM lease sales mandated by the 2025 reconciliation law, which requires four Coastal Plain sales by 2032 under a record of decision making the entire 1.56-million-acre program area available
Current Status
First mandated sale held June 5, 2026: 58 tracts offered, five leased (72,490 acres) to the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority and Hex Energy LLC for $3.7 million. The next sale is required by July 2028.
What Happens If It Proceeds
Oil and gas infrastructure enters the Coastal Plain of the Arctic Refuge, fragmenting the calving habitat of 200,000 Porcupine caribou. Roads, pipelines, and drilling pads would industrialize one of the last undeveloped Arctic landscapes on Earth.
Lands Affected
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain, Alaska (1.56 million acres)
Nominations
Nomination · Confirmed May 18, 2026
Pearce Confirmed as BLM Director

The Senate confirmed Steve Pearce as Director of the Bureau of Land Management on May 18, 46-43, in an en bloc vote packaging 49 nominees. Pearce, a former U.S. Representative (R-NM), derided Theodore Roosevelt's "big ideas of big forests and big national parks" in a 2012 speech and pledged to "reverse this trend of public ownership of land," and he is one of the most outspoken proponents of transferring federal public land to states and private interests in the country. He now oversees 245 million acres of public land. The confirmation vote is scored as Senate vote 19 below.

Nominee
Steve Pearce, former U.S. Representative (R-NM) and former chair of the New Mexico Republican Party
Current Status
Confirmed May 18, 2026, 46-43, in an en bloc vote under S.Res.690. Every senator who voted Yea confirmed the full package of 49 nominees. The vote is scored in the Senate table.
What It Means
Pearce oversees 245 million surface acres and 700 million subsurface mineral acres. As a congressman, he consistently voted to expand energy extraction on public lands, opposed wilderness designations in his home state, and repeatedly backed bills to transfer or sell federal public land.
Lands Affected
All BLM-managed lands (245 million acres across 12 western states, including Alaska)
Nomination · Confirmed August 7, 2026
Lilly Confirmed Over Parks and Wildlife

The Senate confirmed Kevin Lilly as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks on August 7, 51-47, in an en bloc vote packaging 74 nominees. Lilly, a Texas wealth manager, now oversees the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The National Parks Conservation Association urged senators to vote no, and senators from both parties questioned his lack of land management experience at his June 24 hearing. The confirmation vote is scored as Senate vote 20 below.

Nominee
Kevin Lilly, of Texas, wealth management executive who had run the same office on an acting basis since 2025
Current Status
Confirmed August 7, 2026, 51-47, in an en bloc vote under S.Res.817. Every senator who voted Yea confirmed the full package of 74 nominees. The vote is scored in the Senate table.
What It Means
Lilly oversees the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 433 park units and 573 wildlife refuges, during severe staffing cuts and a $22 billion deferred maintenance backlog. Senators from both parties questioned his lack of land management experience at his June hearing.
Lands Affected
All National Park System and National Wildlife Refuge System lands (approximately 180 million acres combined)
Nomination · Withdrawn April 27, 2026
Socha NPS Nomination Withdrawn

The White House withdrew Scott Socha's nomination to lead the National Park Service on April 27 after he asked to be pulled from consideration. Socha, a Delaware North executive with no land management experience, faced sustained scrutiny because his company had trademarked the names "Ahwahnee," "Yosemite Lodge," and "Yosemite National Park" itself, then sought $51 million from the federal government when it lost the Yosemite concession contract. The Park Service has gone the entire administration without a Senate-confirmed director.

Nominee
Scott Socha, former executive at Delaware North Companies (national park concessionaire)
Current Status
Nomination withdrawn by the White House April 27, 2026 at Socha's request, citing personal reasons. No new nominee has been announced. The National Park Service has had no Senate-confirmed director since January 2025.
What It Means
The agency runs on acting leadership during a period of severe staffing cuts, a deferred maintenance backlog exceeding $22 billion, and record visitation pressure. Delaware North's trademark demands over Yosemite place names had forced temporary renaming of historic park landmarks.
Lands Affected
433 national park units totaling 85 million acres
Pro-Lands Bills Worth Supporting
S.1198 · Introduced in Senate
Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act

S.1198 would permanently protect more than 23 million acres of wildlands across Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington, and Oregon as designated wilderness, connecting fragmented habitat corridors across the Northern Rockies.

Bill Number
S.1198
Sponsor
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
Current Status
Referred to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Introduced in every Congress since 1993.
What Happens If It Passes
23 million acres across five states receive permanent wilderness designation, creating the largest connected wildlands corridor in the lower 48. Grizzly bears, wolves, wolverines, and salmon gain unbroken habitat from Yellowstone to the Canadian border.
Lands Affected
Wildlands in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington, and Oregon (23+ million acres)
S.1193 · Introduced in Senate
America's Red Rock Wilderness Act

S.1193 would designate 8.4 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land in Utah with wilderness character as permanent wilderness, protecting the red rock canyons, mesas, and desert landscapes from energy development and road building.

Bill Number
S.1193
Sponsor
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Current Status
Referred to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Introduced in every Congress since 1989.
What Happens If It Passes
8.4 million acres of Utah's canyon country receive permanent wilderness protection. Energy leasing, road-building, and off-road vehicle use would be prohibited in some of the most spectacular desert landscapes on Earth.
Lands Affected
BLM lands across Utah (8.4 million acres of red rock canyons, mesas, arches, and desert rivers)
H.R.3369/S.1737 · Senate Hearing Held
Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

H.R.3369/S.1737 would protect 126,500 acres of Olympic National Forest as wilderness and add 19 rivers and their major tributaries to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System on Washington's Olympic Peninsula.

Bill Number
H.R.3369 / S.1737
Sponsors
Rep. Emily Randall (D-WA) / Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)
Current Status
Senate subcommittee hearing held December 2, 2025. Strong bipartisan local support in Washington state.
What Happens If It Passes
126,500 acres of Olympic National Forest gain wilderness protection and 19 rivers join the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, safeguarding salmon habitat and old-growth forests on the Olympic Peninsula.
Lands Affected
Olympic National Forest, Washington (126,500 acres plus 19 river corridors)
H.R.718 · Introduced in House
Public Lands in Public Hands Act

H.R.718 would bar the Interior and Agriculture departments from transferring publicly accessible federal land, and land adjoining it, out of federal ownership, with exceptions for tracts under 300 acres and existing land laws, a statutory firewall against the land disposal proposals that surface in every Congress. Notably sponsored by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT), Trump's former Interior Secretary, with Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) as original cosponsor.

Bill Number
H.R.718
Sponsor
Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT), with Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) as original cosponsor
Current Status
Referred to House Natural Resources Committee.
What Happens If It Passes
Publicly accessible BLM and Forest Service land cannot be sold or transferred to state or private entities except in small tracts or under existing land laws. This would block the large disposal proposals that appear in nearly every Congress, often as riders on must-pass bills.
Lands Affected
Publicly accessible BLM and Forest Service land nationwide
H.R.588 · Introduced in House
Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection and Pollution Prevention Act

H.R.588 would permanently withdraw 225,504 acres in the Superior National Forest from copper-nickel mining, protecting the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness watershed by statute. Congress overturned the 20-year administrative withdrawal by CRA resolution and the president signed it April 27, 2026 (Public Law 119-85). H.R.588 is now the House counterpart to S.1366 and the only legislative path to permanent protection.

Bill Number
H.R.588
Sponsor
Rep. Betty McCollum (D-MN)
Current Status
Introduced in House. Companion to S.1366 in the Senate.
What Happens If It Passes
Copper-nickel mining is permanently banned on 225,504 acres upstream of America's most-visited wilderness area. Unlike the administrative withdrawal overturned in April 2026, a legislative ban cannot be undone by a future administration or CRA vote.
Lands Affected
225,504 acres of Superior National Forest in the Boundary Waters watershed, Minnesota
S.1366 · Introduced in Senate
Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection Act

S.1366 would permanently ban copper-nickel sulfide mining on 225,504 acres of federal land in the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Congress overturned the 20-year administrative withdrawal that protected this watershed and the president signed the repeal April 27, 2026. S.1366 and its House companion are now the only legislative path to restoring that protection.

Bill Number
S.1366
Sponsor
Sen. Tina Smith (D-MN)
Current Status
Referred to the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee. Gained urgency after the CRA repeal of the mineral withdrawal became law April 27, 2026.
What Happens If It Passes
Copper-nickel sulfide mining is permanently banned on 225,504 acres upstream of the Boundary Waters. Unlike the administrative withdrawal overturned in April 2026, a legislative ban cannot be undone by a future administration or CRA vote.
Lands Affected
225,504 acres of Superior National Forest in the Boundary Waters watershed, Minnesota
H.R.3930/S.2042 · Senate Hearing Held
Roadless Area Conservation Act

H.R.3930/S.2042 would codify the 2001 Roadless Rule into federal law, permanently protecting 58.5 million acres of inventoried roadless areas within the National Forest System from road construction and logging. The administration is currently moving to rescind the Roadless Rule administratively, making this bill the only path to permanent protection.

Bill Number
H.R.3930 / S.2042
Sponsors
Rep. Andrea Salinas (D-OR) / Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
Current Status
Senate subcommittee hearing held December 2, 2025. USDA formally proposed rescinding the Roadless Rule on August 20, 2026, making this bill the only path to permanent protection.
What Happens If It Passes
The Roadless Rule, which has protected 58.5 million acres of the most pristine National Forest land for nearly a quarter century, becomes permanent federal law. Road construction, road reconstruction, and logging are permanently prohibited in inventoried roadless areas. The administration can no longer rescind the rule through rulemaking.
Lands Affected
58.5 million acres of inventoried roadless areas across the National Forest System
S.J.Res.204 · Introduced in Senate
Restoring the ESA Harm Definition

S.J.Res.204 would use the Congressional Review Act to overturn the rule rescinding the definition of harm under the Endangered Species Act. Passage would restore habitat destruction to the conduct the ESA prohibits, a protection on the books since 1975 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 1995.

Bill Number
S.J.Res.204
Sponsor
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Current Status
Introduced August 3, 2026. Discharged from the Environment and Public Works Committee by petition September 15, 2026 and placed on the Senate calendar.
What Happens If It Passes
The rescission rule is overturned and habitat destruction again counts as prohibited harm under the ESA. The agencies cannot issue a substantially similar rescission without new legislation.
Lands Affected
Every landscape with ESA-listed species, including critical habitat across federal public lands nationwide

State Rankings

Average Senate delegation score by state, ranked best to worst

Join over 27,000 people fighting for public lands
Our Substack community tracks every threat and gives you action items before the votes happen.
Subscribe
Score

Methodology

Every score is built from official roll call records. Every link goes to the source.

Scoring Formula

Each scored vote carries equal weight. A member's score is the share of their scored votes cast for public lands, with a missed vote counted as half a vote against.

Score = Pro-Lands Votes ÷ (Pro + Anti + ½ Missed) × 100

Missed votes count against a member's score, but not as severely as voting the wrong way. An anti-lands vote adds 1 to the denominator. A missed vote adds 0.5. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 of 18 scored votes and voted against on 3 scores 83%. A senator who voted pro-lands on 15 and missed 3 scores 91%. Voting against public lands is twice as damaging as missing a vote. Only members who voted pro-lands on every scored vote without a single absence earn a perfect 100%. Members who joined Congress mid-session (through special elections or appointments) are only scored on votes that occurred after they were sworn in. Votes that took place before they held office are excluded entirely and do not affect their score.

The same rule covers a member who dies or resigns: only the votes taken while they held the seat count. Their record stays on the page, marked with the month they left, but it is not ranked and does not count toward state averages or the totals at the top of the page. A member who held a seat but cast no scored vote is not graded. A member is ranked once their record holds at least 5 counted votes (for, against or missed). Below that the grade still shows, with the number of votes it rests on, and the member is not ranked. When two members have the same score, the one with more counted votes ranks higher; members equal on both share a rank.

Grade Scale

  • A+   100%, with a pro-lands vote on every scored vote of the Congress: none missed, and in office for all of them
  • A   90 to 100 (a member at 100% who held the seat for only part of the Congress gets an A)
  • B   80 to 89
  • C   70 to 79
  • D   60 to 69
  • F   0 to 59
  • NR   not rated: no scored vote cast yet

Scores are rounded to the nearest whole percent (an exact half goes to the even number) and the letter is read from the rounded score.

Public Lands Intelligence, our tool for organizations, uses this formula and this scale. It scores the same 19 Senate and 17 House votes under the same ranking rule, and on October 26, 2026 every member's grade, score and rank there matched this page.

What Qualifies as a Public Lands Vote

This scorecard includes three categories of recorded floor votes. (1) Final passage votes (including a vote to agree to the other chamber's version) and motion-to-proceed votes on legislation and Congressional Review Act resolutions that directly govern federal public lands, including management plans, leasing, land disposal, monument designations, Endangered Species Act implementation affecting federal land, and Forest Service and BLM timber policy. (2) Senate confirmation votes, including en bloc packages, for senior officials at the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture whose positions oversee federal public-lands agencies. (3) Amendment votes during budget resolution and reconciliation vote-a-ramas where the amendment directly addressed public-lands management, the federal land-management workforce, or the sale or disposal of federal land.

Amendment votes where the public-lands connection is incidental to a broader topic, including general energy tax credit amendments, broader environmental regulatory amendments, and workforce or funding amendments that cover federal employees generally, are excluded. Voice votes, amendments ruled out of order without a motion to waive, withdrawn amendments, and procedural motions that do not produce a record of individual members' positions are also excluded. The scorecard is updated as additional qualifying votes occur during the 119th Congress.

Lifetime records

Every current member also carries a career record covering the 94th Congress (January 1975) to today, which reaches back to the first vote of the longest-serving member. The same rule applies to every roll call in that window. A member is scored only on votes taken while they held a seat, which the official roll call roster settles. One vote per bill per chamber counts, the passage vote where one exists, with amendments that decide a distinct public lands question counted on their own. Paired and announced positions from earlier decades are shown but not counted. Confirmation votes count only where the nominee held a documented position on public lands. Member positions come from the Voteview record of every roll call since 1789, cross-checked against senate.gov and clerk.house.gov, with bill titles from congress.gov. A lifetime grade appears from a member's first scored vote and shows the number of votes behind it. Written explanations for votes before 2025 are being added over time.

Scored Votes

Correction Policy

If you believe any vote record is incorrect, contact ask@morethanjustparks.com. We check every report against the official roll call record and aim to correct a confirmed error within 24 hours.

Citation

More Than Just Parks. Congressional Public Lands Score, 119th Congress. Updated October 2026. morethanjustparks.com/congressional-public-lands-score/

For Press and Organizations

This score is designed to be cited and shared by newsrooms, advocacy organizations, and 501(c)(3) groups.

Press Contact

For press inquiries, data requests, or interview requests, contact ask@morethanjustparks.com. We aim to respond within 24 hours.

How to Cite This Score

More Than Just Parks. Congressional Public Lands Score, 119th Congress. Updated October 2026. morethanjustparks.com/congressional-public-lands-score/

Key Findings

Lifetime Records

  • Every current member of Congress carries a lifetime public lands record back to January 1975, House and Senate, one ledger per person

For Organizations

This score uses nonpartisan methodology. No party is named or blamed. Individual members are graded on their votes. This tool is designed to be linkable by 501(c)(3) organizations and can be referenced in legislative testimony, press releases, and advocacy materials.

This tool is free because accountability should be free

Building and maintaining the Congressional Public Lands Score takes hundreds of hours of research, data verification, and development. We don't run ads. We don't sell data. We fund this work through our Substack community.

If this score helped you understand how your lawmakers vote on the places you love, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support keeps this tool updated, keeps the data free, and funds the next investigation.