Barataria Preserve hunt unit map opens park to expanded hunting
Secretary Order (SO) 3447 Hunting and Fishing Access
National Park Service· Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, Barataria PreserveNPS Planning (PEPC) project page ↗
NPS PEPCWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
A new map defining the Barataria Hunt Unit would expand hunting access inside Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve.
What’s at risk
Wildlife in the Barataria Preserve face increased hunting pressure as Secretary's Order 3447 pushes NPS to open more park land to hunting. The map locks in where and how hunters can operate within this unit of the park.
If this goes through
The Barataria Hunt Unit boundary becomes official, permanently shaping hunting access and use inside Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve under a federal directive to expand such access parkwide.
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
6 holes in the agency’s own analysis
Make these points, in your own words
- I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
- The notice announces the addition of new hunt zones at Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation but uploads no map or supporting document for the public to review. The 'Document Content' section itself states 'No files have been uploaded for this document.' A comment period cannot be meaningful when the actual map being reviewed is only accessible via an external link that may change, and no document is lodged in the official record. The agency should upload the hunt zone map directly to the PEPC record so the public can comment on the specific boundaries, access points, and zone configurations that are the subject of this action.
- The notice states that 'The Barataria Preserve added additional hunt zones for the 2026-2027 seasons' but provides no explanation of what authority, process, or environmental review supported that decision. Secretary Order 3447 is cited as the governing framework, but no analysis, categorical exclusion, EA, or EIS is referenced or posted. The agency should identify and post the NEPA compliance document or other decision record that authorized the expansion of hunting into Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation.
- The comment period runs from September 12 to October 14, 2026, a period of roughly 32 days. During that window, the public is asked to comment on a map that is not lodged in the PEPC record but instead hosted at an external NPS URL. If that external page is updated or the map is revised during the comment period, commenters may be reviewing different versions of the proposed action at different times, with no version control in the official record. The agency should lock a dated, titled copy of the map into the PEPC docket before the comment period closes.
- The notice names two new zones, Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation, but provides no description of the size, boundaries, permitted species, weapon types, season dates, or access routes for either zone. Without that information in the notice itself, the public cannot assess potential conflicts with hiking, wildlife observation, paddling, or other existing uses of those areas. The agency should include a plain-language description of the scope and rules for each new zone in the project description.
Show all 8 points from the document
- The only topic question posed to the public is 'You are welcome to comment on the updated hunt zone map,' which is an open-ended invitation rather than a set of specific questions about impacts, safety, access, or wildlife. Under NEPA and NPS planning guidance, public involvement should be structured to elicit substantive input on the issues the agency must resolve. The agency should publish specific scoping questions addressing wildlife impacts, user conflicts, access, and Tribal interests so that the comment period generates a record the agency can actually respond to.
- The notice references Secretary Order 3447 as the basis for this action but does not explain how SO 3447 applies to a unit of the National Park System, what conditions or limitations SO 3447 imposes, or whether its requirements have been satisfied for this specific expansion. The public cannot evaluate whether the agency followed its own governing order. The agency should post or summarize the relevant provisions of SO 3447 that authorize and constrain this hunt zone expansion.
- Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.
In the agency’s own words
Barataria Hunt Unit Map
Did the agency answer?
6 issues are on this record. The agency has not published its decision document yet, so each one stays pending until the agency answers.
Issues on the record, awaiting the decision
- PendingThe notice states that 'The Barataria Preserve added additional hunt zones for the 2026-2027 seasons' but provides no explanation of what authority, process, or environmental review supported that dec
The notice states that 'The Barataria Preserve added additional hunt zones for the 2026-2027 seasons' but provides no explanation of what authority, process, or environmental review supported that decision. Secretary Order 3447 is cited as the governing framework, but no analysis, categorical exclusion, EA, or EIS is referenced or posted. The agency should identify and post the NEPA compliance document or other decision record that authorized the expansion of hunting into Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
- PendingThe only topic question posed to the public is 'You are welcome to comment on the updated hunt zone map,' which is an open-ended invitation rather than a set of specific questions about impacts, safet
The only topic question posed to the public is 'You are welcome to comment on the updated hunt zone map,' which is an open-ended invitation rather than a set of specific questions about impacts, safety, access, or wildlife. Under NEPA and NPS planning guidance, public involvement should be structured to elicit substantive input on the issues the agency must resolve. The agency should publish specific scoping questions addressing wildlife impacts, user conflicts, access, and Tribal interests so that the comment period generates a record the agency can actually respond to.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
- PendingThe comment period runs from September 12 to October 14, 2026, a period of roughly 32 days.
The comment period runs from September 12 to October 14, 2026, a period of roughly 32 days. During that window, the public is asked to comment on a map that is not lodged in the PEPC record but instead hosted at an external NPS URL. If that external page is updated or the map is revised during the comment period, commenters may be reviewing different versions of the proposed action at different times, with no version control in the official record. The agency should lock a dated, titled copy of the map into the PEPC docket before the comment period closes.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
- PendingThe notice announces the addition of new hunt zones at Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation but uploads no map or supporting document for the public to review.
The notice announces the addition of new hunt zones at Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation but uploads no map or supporting document for the public to review. The 'Document Content' section itself states 'No files have been uploaded for this document.' A comment period cannot be meaningful when the actual map being reviewed is only accessible via an external link that may change, and no document is lodged in the official record. The agency should upload the hunt zone map directly to the PEPC record so the public can comment on the specific boundaries, access points, and zone configurations that are the subject of this action.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
- PendingThe notice names two new zones, Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation, but provides no description of the size, boundaries, permitted species, weapon types, season dates, or access routes for ei
The notice names two new zones, Bayou aux Carpes and the Fleming Plantation, but provides no description of the size, boundaries, permitted species, weapon types, season dates, or access routes for either zone. Without that information in the notice itself, the public cannot assess potential conflicts with hiking, wildlife observation, paddling, or other existing uses of those areas. The agency should include a plain-language description of the scope and rules for each new zone in the project description.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
- PendingThe notice references Secretary Order 3447 as the basis for this action but does not explain how SO 3447 applies to a unit of the National Park System, what conditions or limitations SO 3447 imposes,
The notice references Secretary Order 3447 as the basis for this action but does not explain how SO 3447 applies to a unit of the National Park System, what conditions or limitations SO 3447 imposes, or whether its requirements have been satisfied for this specific expansion. The public cannot evaluate whether the agency followed its own governing order. The agency should post or summarize the relevant provisions of SO 3447 that authorize and constrain this hunt zone expansion.
A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own notice, quote verified against the text
The reporting behind this
From More Than Just ParksAfter more than a decade chasing peak color across America, we built the foliage map we always wanted.
Another foreign mining company wants a piece of America’s public lands. This one comes with millions of gallons of groundwater pumping and radioactive radon.
The administration went looking for a sliver of Yosemite for a private developer and finally convinced the rest of public-lands world that if Yosemite is negotiable, nothing is safe.
More actions that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .