Comments closed September 6
BOEM offshore energy plan lacks specific project details
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management · federal offshore waters
- What
- Without document specifics, the exact waters and uses at risk cannot be confirmed.
- Where
- federal offshore waters
- How much
- Federal Outer Continental Shelf waters could be opened to energy development, but the document summary does not name specific areas, acreages, or activities.
- Decided
- Comments closed September 6, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from regulations.gov ↗, read August 28, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Regulations.gov comment docket ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedSeptember 6, 2026, from regulations.gov, the document’s comment end date ↗. Read August 28, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Affects public lands
Without document specifics, the exact waters and uses at risk cannot be confirmed.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
The agency’s own analysis
What the notice says, and what it leaves out
The window has closed; the record of what was missing stays.
The agency says
“The Rice's whale area is over 70.3 miles from the proposed operations.”
The plan identifies the Rice's whale habitat as approximately 104 statute miles from the proposed well location and states vessel traffic will not transit the Rice's whale area.
In the agency’s own words
Other
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Regulations.govWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.