← All actions
Record closed September 6, 2026
Affects public lands

BOEM offshore energy plan lacks specific project details

G25098S8235PublicPlan

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management· federal offshore waters, Outer Continental ShelfRegulations.gov comment docket ↗

Regulations.govWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

Without document specifics, the exact waters and uses at risk cannot be confirmed.

What’s at risk

Federal Outer Continental Shelf waters could be opened to energy development, but the document summary does not name specific areas, acreages, or activities. No verified details are available to describe the precise threat.

If this goes through

If approved, the plan would govern how offshore federal waters are managed for energy development, but the scope and permanence cannot be stated without the actual document content.

Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.

4 holes in the agency’s own analysis

What the public could have raised, from the agency’s own document

  • I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
  • The plan identifies the Rice's whale habitat as approximately 104 statute miles from the proposed well location and states vessel traffic will not transit the Rice's whale area. However, the plan does not analyze underwater noise propagation from drilling operations, support vessel traffic, and helicopter operations relative to this critically endangered species with a population of fewer than 100 individuals. The plan merely states 'The Rice's whale area is over 70.3 miles from the proposed operations.' No acoustic analysis or received level calculation is provided. BOEM should require a site-specific acoustic analysis for Rice's whale before approving operations.
  • BOEM must hear from the public before finalizing any plan that governs how federal offshore waters on the Outer Continental Shelf are managed for energy development or conservation.
  • This planning process determines how ocean resources in federal offshore waters are used, and the public comment period is the formal mechanism for the public to shape that outcome.
  • I urge BOEM to ensure full transparency in this planning document so that all uses and protections proposed for Outer Continental Shelf waters are clearly identified and justified.
Show all 6 points from the document
  • Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.
Every point is checked against the agency’s own decision document ↗. 1 finding verified against the text, word for word.

In the agency’s own words

Other

Regulations.gov comment docket ↗

Did the agency answer?

1 issue is on this record. The agency has not published its decision document yet, so it stays pending until the agency answers.

Issues on the record, awaiting the decision

  • PendingThe plan identifies the Rice's whale habitat as approximately 104 statute miles from the proposed well location and states vessel traffic will not transit the Rice's whale area.

    The plan identifies the Rice's whale habitat as approximately 104 statute miles from the proposed well location and states vessel traffic will not transit the Rice's whale area. However, the plan does not analyze underwater noise propagation from drilling operations, support vessel traffic, and helicopter operations relative to this critically endangered species with a population of fewer than 100 individuals. The plan merely states 'The Rice's whale area is over 70.3 miles from the proposed operations.' No acoustic analysis or received level calculation is provided. BOEM should require a site-specific acoustic analysis for Rice's whale before approving operations.

    A hole PLAN found in the agency’s own analysis, quote verified against the document

More actions that need you

Go deeper, free

A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.

Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .