
Comments closed June 10
Oppose Application for a Recordable Disclaimer of Interest in
Bureau of Land Management · SD
- What
- The BLM received an application from Prairie Shores, LLC to disclaim federal interest in an unplatted peninsula in Lake County, SD, which would effectively transfer that land out of federal ownership as part of a private land purchase. If granted, the Recordable Disclaimer of Interest would mean the U.S. government no longer claims the surface and subsurface rights to that parcel. The public has an opportunity to comment before the BLM moves forward with granting the disclaimer.
- Where
- SD
- How much
- We have no figure for this fight yet; the agency’s own words are under Case.
- Decided
- Comments closed June 10, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read May 6, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur summary of the Federal Register 2026-04782 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchNo verified figure is on the record for this fight.
- DecidedJune 10, 2026, from Federal Register, the document’s comment close date (federalregister.gov) ↗. Read May 6, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Affects public lands
The BLM received an application from Prairie Shores, LLC to disclaim federal interest in an unplatted peninsula in Lake County, SD, which would effectively transfer that land out of federal ownership as part of a private land purchase. If granted, the Recordable Disclaimer of Interest would mean the U.S. government no longer claims the surface and subsurface rights to that parcel. The public has an opportunity to comment before the BLM moves forward with granting the disclaimer.
In the agency’s own words
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received an application for a Recordable Disclaimer of Interest (RDI) from Prairie Shores, LLC/ Redstone Law Firm, LLP pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, and BLM regulations for the surface and subsurface estates. Prairie Shores, LLC is purchasing land and requests the United States disclaim the unplatted peninsula as federally owned. This notice is intended to inform the public of the pending application and give notice of the BLM's intent to grant the requested RDI and provide a public comment period for the RDI.
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in South Dakota
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in South Dakota, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Badlands Natural History Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works South Dakota: They work only in South Dakota.
- Black Hills Parks and Forests Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works South Dakota: They work only in South Dakota.
- Friends of Wind Cave National Park
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works South Dakota: They work only in South Dakota.
- Wind Cave National Park Friends Group
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works South Dakota: They work only in South Dakota.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
The photograph on this page: Storm over prairie grassland, Badlands country, South Dakota. More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.