
Comments closed September 1
Stop regeneration logging near New Castle in Craig County
U.S. Forest Service · George Washington and Jefferson National Forests, VA
- What
- The Forest Service proposes logging, herbicide use, and temporary road construction across 1,059 acres near New Castle, Virginia.
- Where
- George Washington and Jefferson National Forests, VA, WV
- How much
- Up to 1,059 acres of the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests face regeneration harvests, herbicide treatments, and new temporary roads.
- Decided
- Comments closed September 1, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Forest Service comment page (CARA) ↗, read August 4, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Forest Service project page ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the project page names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedSeptember 1, 2026, from Forest Service comment page (CARA), its “comments are requested through” date ↗. Read August 4, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
PLAN's read: high threat
The Forest Service proposes logging, herbicide use, and temporary road construction across 1,059 acres near New Castle, Virginia.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
In the agency’s own words
Forest health improvement project across 1,059 acres near New Castle in Craig County, Virginia. Proposed treatments include regeneration harvests, manual site preparation, herbicide treatments for invasive or undesirable vegetation, and construction and use of temporary roads.
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Virginia and West Virginia
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Virginia and West Virginia, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Friends of the Allegheny Front
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works West Virginia: They work only in West Virginia.
- Mountain Institute
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Works West Virginia: West Virginia is one of the 2 states they work in.
- Shenandoah National Park Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Shenandoah National Park, Virginia: A nonprofit partner of Shenandoah National Park.
- Shenandoah National Park Trust
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Shenandoah National Park, Virginia: A nonprofit partner of Shenandoah National Park.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
The photograph on this page: Wild turkey in hardwood forest. It’s the country this decision sits in, not the site itself. More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
2 court cases are over George Washington National Forest and Jefferson National Forest, newest first.
Decided · filed June 15, 2020
United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Assn.
Decided. We don’t hold the court’s words on it yet.
Decided · no date on file
Sierra Club, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service
Decided. We don’t hold the court’s words on it yet.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.