Stop fuel breaks above the Wallowa Valley at Eagle Cap
Upper Wallowa Valley Fuel Breaks
U.S. Forest Service· Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Eagle Cap WildernessU.S. Forest Service project page ↗
Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.

The groups on this fight
4 groups work Oregon
By footprint, from the same match the STAND matchmaker runs; none is linked to this decision in our record yet. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Cascadia Wildlands
Works Oregon: plaintiff in the January 2026 suit against the Roseburg BLM plan to log nearly 7,000 acres near Camas Valley.
- Crag Law Center
Works Oregon: represented Bird Alliance of Oregon, the Center for Biological Diversity, and Cascadia Wildlands in the 2012 Endangered Species Act suit over logging occupied murrelet habitat, which ended in the 2014 settlement canceling 28 timber sales..
- Oregon Natural Desert Association
Works Oregon: anchors the McDermitt Caldera Coalition on the Oregon side and fought the BLM's December 2025 approval of the Jindalee/HiTech lithium exploration project through the permitting process..
- Oregon Wild
Works Oregon: repeat plaintiff against BLM old-growth sales on the O&C lands, including the Coast Range project where courts halted logging of stands with trees over a thousand years old.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
A second, separate project would build permanent fuel breaks in the Upper Wallowa Valley, on the north edge of the Eagle Cap Wilderness. Same forest, same deadline, different ground.
What’s at risk
The Eagle Cap Wilderness and surrounding national forest lands face physical alteration from constructed fuel breaks. These structures, once built, change the landscape and can open wilderness-adjacent areas to ongoing mechanical disturbance.
If this goes through
Permanent fuel breaks will be built near the Eagle Cap Wilderness boundary, fragmenting habitat and setting a precedent for further infrastructure in sensitive wildland areas.
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
3 holes in the agency’s own analysis
What the public could have raised, from the agency’s own document
- I oppose this action as proposed, and I ask the agency to weigh the specific harms below.
- This proposal would construct strategic fuel breaks on Wallowa-Whitman National Forest lands near the Eagle Cap Wilderness, and I oppose moving forward without a full NEPA review that weighs the impacts on that wilderness boundary.
- Building fuel breaks adjacent to the Eagle Cap Wilderness risks fragmenting habitat and altering the natural fire ecology that wilderness designation is meant to protect.
- The Wallowa Valley Ranger District should demonstrate that fuel breaks near private lands and local communities will not cause unintended ecological harm before any ground-disturbing work begins.
- Say something only you can say. The law requires the agency to consider and respond to substantive comments, and specifics are what make a comment substantive.
In the agency’s own words
The purpose of this project is to create strategic fuel breaks that would assist in the management of future natural and prescribed fires on National Forest lands that are in close proximity to the Eagle Cap Wilderness and private lands and adjacent to communities and infrastructure.
The reporting behind this
From More Than Just ParksAfter more than a decade chasing peak color across America, we built the foliage map we always wanted.
Another foreign mining company wants a piece of America’s public lands. This one comes with millions of gallons of groundwater pumping and radioactive radon.
The administration went looking for a sliver of Yosemite for a private developer and finally convinced the rest of public-lands world that if Yosemite is negotiable, nothing is safe.
More actions that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
