Comments closed September 25
Support strong protections for Elkhorn Slough Reserve
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, CA
- What
- Public comments now shape whether this California coastal wetland reserve keeps meeting its conservation goals.
- Where
- Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, CA
- How much
- Elkhorn Slough's coastal wetlands, wildlife habitat, and water quality depend on the reserve meeting its research, education, and stewardship standards.
- Decided
- Comments closed September 25, 2026. No decision document is on file yet.Date from Federal Register ↗, read August 2, 2026.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Federal Register 2026-15518 ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the notice names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedSeptember 25, 2026, from Federal Register, the document’s comment close date (federalregister.gov) ↗. Read August 2, 2026. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
Keelin S. Kuipers
Acting Director, Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
A person signed this, not an agency. The window has closed and the signature stands, which is exactly when accountability matters.
National Ocean Service
Assistant Administrator
Short is better. You are asking the Assistant Administrator to answer for a decision their office made.
My name is [your name] and I'm calling from [your city and state]. Keelin S. Kuipers, Acting Director, Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, signed the decision on Support strong protections for Elkhorn Slough Reserve. I'm asking the National Ocean Service to withdraw that decision and require full environmental review before anything proceeds. Please record that I called and tell me what the office intends to do.
Official channels only, about this decision. No personal phone numbers, no home addresses, no personal social accounts, and nothing abusive. The point is to make the office answer, and an abusive call is the one thing that lets it off the hook.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
Protective action worth supporting
Public comments now shape whether this California coastal wetland reserve keeps meeting its conservation goals.
What’s at risk
If we stay silent
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
The agency’s own analysis
What the notice says, and what it leaves out
The window has closed; the record of what was missing stays.
The agency says
“During the evaluation, NOAA will consider the extent to which the state has met the national objectives and adhered to the management plan approved by the Secretary of Commerce”
The notice provides no description of what the evaluation will actually examine -- no criteria, no metrics, no list of which national objectives are being assessed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ↗
The agency says
“A copy of the evaluation notification letter, reserve management plan, reserve site profile, and most recent progress report may be obtained upon request by contacting Pam Kylstra.”
Key evaluation documents -- the evaluation notification letter, reserve management plan, site profile, and most recent progress report -- are available only by contacting a single named agency employee.
The agency says
“NOAA will hold a hybrid-format public meeting from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on Tuesday, September 15, 2026”
The public meeting runs from 6 p.m.
The agency says
“NOAA will consider all relevant written comments received by Friday, September 25, 2026.”
The written comment deadline of September 25, 2026 is only ten days after the public meeting on September 15, 2026.
The agency says
“Comments that are not related to the performance evaluation of ESNERR or that contain profanity, vulgarity, threats, or other inappropriate language will not be considered.”
The notice states that comments 'not related to the performance evaluation of ESNERR' will not be considered, but provides no definition of what falls within scope.
The agency says
“The evaluation process includes holding one or more public meetings, considering public comments, and consulting with interested Federal, State, local agencies, and members of the public.”
The notice does not state whether tribal consultation has been initiated or completed as part of this evaluation.
The agency says
“NOAA will consider the extent to which the state has met the national objectives and adhered to the management plan approved by the Secretary of Commerce, the requirements of Section 315 of the CZMA, and the terms of financial assistance”
The notice does not disclose what consequences flow from a negative evaluation finding -- whether NOAA can withhold financial assistance, require corrective action, or modify the management plan.
In the agency’s own words
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management will hold a hybrid-format public meeting to solicit input on the performance evaluation of the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve (ESNERR). NOAA also invites the public to submit written comments.
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in California
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in California, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- California Wilderness Coalition
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Chuckwalla National Monument, California: Spent years building the designation campaign with Tribal nations and now defends the monument as an intervenor in federal court.
- Joshua Tree National Park Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Joshua Tree National Park, California: A nonprofit partner of Joshua Tree National Park.
- Los Padres ForestWatch
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Los Padres National Forest, California: Has led opposition to oil drilling in the Los Padres region for two decades and is fighting the plan to reopen 400,000 acres to leasing.
- Yosemite Conservancy
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Yosemite National Park, California: A nonprofit partner of Yosemite National Park.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
Keelin S. Kuipers
Acting Director, Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Where the notice says so
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
The photograph on this page: Tidal marsh channels at Elkhorn Slough, California (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service photo). More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
This fight isn’t bound to a land unit in PLAN’s record yet, so there are no court cases to show for its ground.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.