Comments closed
Stop commercial logging across 14,400 acres near Sisters
U.S. Forest Service · Sisters Canyons, Deschutes National Forest
- What
- The Forest Service plans to commercially log, thin, and burn a large stretch of the Deschutes National Forest outside Sisters, Oregon.
- Where
- Sisters Canyons, Deschutes National Forest, OR
- How much
- About 14,400 acres of forest in the Sisters Canyons area face commercial timber harvest, mechanical thinning, mowing, and prescribed burning.
- Decided
- Comments closed; deadline not stated by the agency. No decision document is on file yet.
Where these four lines come from
- WhatOur plain-English read of the Forest Service project page ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words under Case.
- WhereThe places and states the project page names, as PLAN read them.
- How muchThe first sentence of our What’s at risk read of the notice; the whole read is under Case.
- DecidedWe haven’t found where this fight’s close date came from, so the card shows no date. The decision document is the one on file in PLAN’s record.
- Read from PLAN’s record November 9, 2026.
What the proposal said, and what the decision did
No figure from the proposal has been checked against the decision on this fight yet. What the record does hold is the issues ledger below.
No decision document is on PLAN’s record for this fight yet. When the agency’s decision lands, what it answered goes here.
PLAN's read: high threat
The Forest Service plans to commercially log, thin, and burn a large stretch of the Deschutes National Forest outside Sisters, Oregon.
What’s at risk
If this goes through
Our plain-English read of the official notice ↗. Check it against the agency’s own words below.
In the agency’s own words
The proposed action includes approximately 14,400 acres of thinning (shaded fuels break, commercial and small tree), mowing, and/or prescribed burning. In addition, a well-established user trail within an isolated Forest Service parcel would be added to the Forest Service trail system.
The groups on this fight
4 groups predicted likely to care in Oregon
Predicted likely to care is a guess from the group's sourced work in Oregon, with no link to this decision. Give straight to them; nothing routes through us.
- Cascadia Wildlands
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Western Oregon O&C Lands, Oregon: Serial litigant against western Oregon BLM logging, from the 2016 management plan challenge to the current round of timber sale suits.
- Crag Law Center
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Western Oregon O&C Lands, Oregon: Counsel of record for the conservation groups fighting BLM logging across the O&C forests.
- Oregon Natural Desert Association
Predicted likely to care · a guess
McDermitt Caldera, Oregon: Anchors the McDermitt Caldera Coalition on the Oregon side and fought the BLM's December 2025 approval of the Jindalee/HiTech lithium exploration project through the permitting process.
- Oregon Wild
Predicted likely to care · a guess
Western Oregon O&C Lands, Oregon: Its attorneys, with Cascadia Wildlands and Crag Law Center, represent the groups challenging BLM's Blue and Gold old-growth logging project in the Coast Range.
Every group above is on STAND for Public Lands, with its court record, its filings and who backs it.
Who signs it
The notice names no signer PLAN could read. PLAN names a decision-maker only when the document names one.
The ground
The window has closed, so there’s no watch to set on it here.
The photograph on this page: Deschutes National Forest, Oregon. More Than Just Parks.
In court on this ground
One court case is over Deschutes National Forest, newest first.
Docket closed · no date on file
The court closed the docket. We don’t hold its entries yet.
Who holds the vote
PLAN’s record doesn’t tie a member of Congress to this fight yet. The scorecard grades the votes and bills that decide public lands; nothing joins a vote or a bill to this decision, so there’s no member to name here without guessing.
See how your members vote ↗Forest ServiceWe track this on the agency’s own system of record, where most on-the-ground decisions live.
Know an open comment period we are missing, or spotted a wrong deadline? .
More fights that need you
Go deeper, free
See how your members of Congress vote on public lands
Every representative, graded on the votes that decide the fate of parks, forests, and refuges.
Open ↗The mapSee the places under active threat
A live map of the parks, monuments, and wild country in the crosshairs right now.
Open ↗A wrong fact, a dead link, a form that wouldn’t take your letter: one tap and it comes to the people who build PLAN, with this fight attached.