Custer National Forest
The agency stopped taking comments on September 14. What you find still counts: it backs the formal objections from people who did comment, it goes to the lawyers on the fight, and it is the story.
“The actual risk of crown fire may be higher than the landscape fire behavior analysis results show, as crown fire potential is often underestimated in Eastern Montana ponderosa pine due to model limitations.”
The agency wrote that in its own document, under Fire and Fuels. Nobody has been out to check it. A dated photograph either backs it up or ends it.
In the Chalk Buttes ponderosa pine stands marked for thinning, photograph what sits under the big trees: crowded small trees, low dead limbs, and brush reaching toward the canopy. A photo showing an unbroken ladder of small trees and low limbs into the canopy, or bare open ground under widely spaced pines.
The Sioux Ranger District is proposing a large-scale timber and fuels project in the Custer Gallatin National Forest that includes over 1,600 acres of commercial logging and nearly 4,400 acres of mechanical thinning. Prescribed fire is also planned across more than 3,100 acres, with some areas receiving multiple treatments. It's an ordinary public comment period, so submitting comments is key to p
Read the whole thing, and write to the agency about itSay yes or no. It tells the next person whether anyone has this ground covered, and it is the only way we know a request was answered rather than just read. You can change your mind any time, and nobody follows up.
Nobody has answered yet
More Than Just Parks doesn’t direct where you go or what you do. Terms.